SLICC/ACR damage index in Afro-Caribbean patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: Changes in and relationship to disease activity, corticosteroid therapy, and prognosis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

69 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective. To apply the recently described Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/American College of Rheumatology Damage Index (SLICC/ACR-DI) in a well defined cohort of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and to study its association with disease activity, corticosteroid therapy, and prognosis. Methods. We conducted a record review of 90 patients with SLE followed at a single center for a mean period of 6 years with periodic evaluations of SLE Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI), cumulative damage according to SLICC/ACR-DI, and therapy. Overall disease activity during the disease course was calculated as weighted averages of SLEDAI (WAS). Results. Mean SLICC/ACR-DI was 0.6 six months after diagnosis and increased to 2.4 at last assessment. Thirteen patients (14%) remained free of accumulated damage at last visit. Index scores showed significant correlations with WAS scores and the number of disease exacerbations (SLEDAI > 10), but not with age, mean daily, or cumulative corticosteroid dosage. High WAS scores were independently associated with poorer survival, but SLICC/ACR-DI scores were not. Conclusion. SLICC/ACR-DI scores correlate with overall disease activity, but not with length or intensity of corticosteroid therapy. While easily applicable, its prognostic value is subordinate to that of persistent disease activity.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)654-659
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Rheumatology
Volume25
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - Apr 1998

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'SLICC/ACR damage index in Afro-Caribbean patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: Changes in and relationship to disease activity, corticosteroid therapy, and prognosis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this