Simulation and Feedback in Health Education: A Mixed Methods Study Comparing Three Simulation Modalities

Lauren Tait, Kenneth Lee, Rohan Rasiah, Joyce Cooper, Tristan Ling, Benjamin Geelan, Ivan Bindoff

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background. There are numerous approaches to simulating a patient encounter in pharmacy education. However, little direct comparison between these approaches has been undertaken. Our objective was to investigate student experiences, satisfaction, and feedback preferences between three scenario simulation modalities (paper-, actor-, and computer-based). Methods. We conducted a mixed methods study with randomized cross-over of simulation modalities on final-year Australian graduate-entry Master of Pharmacy students. Participants completed case-based scenarios within each of three simulation modalities, with feedback provided at the completion of each scenario in a format corresponding to each simulation modality. A post-simulation questionnaire collected qualitative and quantitative responses pertaining to participant satisfaction, experiences, and feedback preferences. Results. Participants reported similar levels satisfaction across all three modalities. However, each modality resulted in unique positive and negative experiences, such as student disengagement with paper-based scenarios. Conclusion. Importantly, the themes of guidance and opportunity for peer discussion underlie the best forms of feedback for students. The provision of feedback following simulation should be carefully considered and delivered, with all three simulation modalities producing both positive and negative experiences in regard to their feedback format.
Original languageEnglish
Article number41
JournalPharmacy
Volume6
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2018

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Simulation and Feedback in Health Education: A Mixed Methods Study Comparing Three Simulation Modalities'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this