Activities per year
Abstract
Australian consumer protection law contains broad and flexible prohibitions on misleading and unconscionable conduct in trade or commerce. Yet concerns have been raised that these prohibitions are unsuitable for responding to predatory business systems. These are businesses that, by design or operation, target consumers experiencing vulnerability to offer costly products ill-suited to their needs. This concern has arisen in response to prominent instances of products of dubious efficacy offered to marginalized communities. It has also arisen from concerns over the increasing potential for data-driven digital marketing to manipulate consumer choice by targeting with fine-grained accuracy consumer vulnerabilities. In response to these concerns, it has been suggested that the Australian Consumer Law should be reformed, by introducing a prohibition on “unfair trading” inspired by the general prohibitions on such conduct in the EU and USA. This paper explores the key considerations relevant in assessing the merits of this proposed statutory “transplant.” Ultimately, the paper is supportive of the proposed reform, while also recognizing its limits.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Journal | Journal of Consumer Policy: consumer issues in law, economics and behavioral sciences |
Volume | 44 |
Issue number | 1 |
Early online date | 22 Aug 2020 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Mar 2021 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Should Australia Introduce a Prohibition on Unfair Trading? Responding to Exploitative Business Systems in Person and Online'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Activities
- 1 Citation in Australian or overseas Parlimentary department, intergovernmental and NGO reports
-
ALRC Report into Corporate Criminal Responsibility No 136
Elise Bant (Consultant)
Apr 2020Activity: Industry and government engagement/consultancy › Citation in Australian or overseas Parliamentary department, intergovernmental and NGO reports
File