TY - JOUR
T1 - Shifting research dynamics: Addressing power and maximising participation through participatory research techniques in participatory research.
AU - van der Riet, Mary
AU - Boettiger Grant, Merridy
PY - 2009/3/1
Y1 - 2009/3/1
N2 - Power dynamics in the research interaction
are inevitable, particularly in research in rural contexts. Hierarchical and
heterogeneous research groups, and the disproportionate power of the researcher
in relation to the research participants, are some of the problems that create
particular challenges for the social science researcher. Power relations within
the research context also affect the way in which knowledge is generated.
Participatory research (PR) acknowledges and actively addresses many of these power
dynamics. Through the use of novel techniques, PR processes focus on maximising
participation and facilitating the expression of multiple voices within the
research context. The use of visual representations de-emphasises verbal
fluency and also creates the potential for change. PR also has a specific focus
on accessing the more marginalized and most disempowered sections of a
community. Despite the power dynamics, PR methods enable participants to
articulate, extend, and analyse their local knowledge. Using photographs of
participatory activities, drawn from the Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA)
tradition, several ways in which participatory research techniques alter some
of these research dynamics are illustrated, e.g. who talks and who acts in the
process; whose knowledge dominates in the process; whose language is used as a
medium in the process; and how is the knowledge produced. The potential of
participatory research engagements to enable participation, access local
knowledge, and facilitate critical reflection is discussed. The combination of
these factors activates the agency of the research participants, potentially
effecting change.
AB - Power dynamics in the research interaction
are inevitable, particularly in research in rural contexts. Hierarchical and
heterogeneous research groups, and the disproportionate power of the researcher
in relation to the research participants, are some of the problems that create
particular challenges for the social science researcher. Power relations within
the research context also affect the way in which knowledge is generated.
Participatory research (PR) acknowledges and actively addresses many of these power
dynamics. Through the use of novel techniques, PR processes focus on maximising
participation and facilitating the expression of multiple voices within the
research context. The use of visual representations de-emphasises verbal
fluency and also creates the potential for change. PR also has a specific focus
on accessing the more marginalized and most disempowered sections of a
community. Despite the power dynamics, PR methods enable participants to
articulate, extend, and analyse their local knowledge. Using photographs of
participatory activities, drawn from the Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA)
tradition, several ways in which participatory research techniques alter some
of these research dynamics are illustrated, e.g. who talks and who acts in the
process; whose knowledge dominates in the process; whose language is used as a
medium in the process; and how is the knowledge produced. The potential of
participatory research engagements to enable participation, access local
knowledge, and facilitate critical reflection is discussed. The combination of
these factors activates the agency of the research participants, potentially
effecting change.
U2 - 10.1177/008124630903900101
DO - 10.1177/008124630903900101
M3 - Article
SN - 0081-2463
VL - 39
JO - South African Journal of Psychology
JF - South African Journal of Psychology
IS - 11
ER -