Shariant platform: Enabling evidence sharing across Australian clinical genetic-testing laboratories to support variant interpretation

Emma Tudini, James Andrews, David M. Lawrence, Sarah L. King-Smith, Naomi Baker, Leanne Baxter, John Beilby, Bruce Bennetts, Victoria Beshay, Michael Black, Tiffany F. Boughtwood, Kristian Brion, Pak Leng Cheong, Michael Christie, John Christodoulou, Belinda Chong, Kathy Cox, Mark R. Davis, Lucas Dejong, Marcel E. DingerKenneth D. Doig, Evelyn Douglas, Andrew Dubowsky, Melissa Ellul, Andrew Fellowes, Katrina Fisk, Cristina Fortuno, Kathryn Friend, Renee L. Gallagher, Song Gao, Emma Hackett, Johanna Hadler, Michael Hipwell, Gladys Ho, Georgina Hollway, Amanda J. Hooper, Karin S. Kassahn, Rahul Krishnaraj, Chiyan Lau, Huong Le, Huei San Leong, Ben Lundie, Sebastian Lunke, Anthony Marty, Mary McPhillips, Lan T. Nguyen, Katia Nones, Kristen Palmer, John V. Pearson, Michael C.J. Quinn, Lesley H. Rawlings, Simon Sadedin, Louisa Sanchez, Andreas W. Schreiber, Emanouil Sigalas, Aygul Simsek, Julien Soubrier, Zornitza Stark, Bryony A. Thompson, James U, Cassandra G. Vakulin, Amanda V. Wells, Cheryl A. Wise, Rick Woods, Andrew Ziolkowski, Marie Jo Brion, Hamish S. Scott, Natalie P. Thorne, Amanda B. Spurdle

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

Sharing genomic variant interpretations across laboratories promotes consistency in variant assertions. A landscape analysis of Australian clinical genetic-testing laboratories in 2017 identified that, despite the national-accreditation-body recommendations encouraging laboratories to submit genotypic data to clinical databases, fewer than 300 variants had been shared to the ClinVar public database. Consultations with Australian laboratories identified resource constraints limiting routine application of manual processes, consent issues, and differences in interpretation systems as barriers to sharing. This information was used to define key needs and solutions required to enable national sharing of variant interpretations. The Shariant platform, using both the GRCh37 and GRCh38 genome builds, was developed to enable ongoing sharing of variant interpretations and associated evidence between Australian clinical genetic-testing laboratories. Where possible, two-way automated sharing was implemented so that disruption to laboratory workflows would be minimized. Terms of use were developed through consultation and currently restrict access to Australian clinical genetic-testing laboratories. Shariant was designed to store and compare structured evidence, to promote and record resolution of inter-laboratory classification discrepancies, and to streamline the submission of variant assertions to ClinVar. As of December 2021, more than 14,000 largely prospectively curated variant records from 11 participating laboratories have been shared. Discrepant classifications have been identified for 11% (28/260) of variants submitted by more than one laboratory. We have demonstrated that co-design with clinical laboratories is vital to developing and implementing a national variant-interpretation sharing effort. This approach has improved inter-laboratory concordance and enabled opportunities to standardize interpretation practices.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1960-1973
Number of pages14
JournalAmerican Journal of Human Genetics
Volume109
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 3 Nov 2022

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Shariant platform: Enabling evidence sharing across Australian clinical genetic-testing laboratories to support variant interpretation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this