TY - JOUR
T1 - Selective attentional processes in cochlear implant recipients
T2 - Measurements of the attentional filter
AU - Bester, Christofer
AU - Jayakody, Dona M P
AU - Hammond, Geoffrey
AU - Robertson, Donald
PY - 2016/12/1
Y1 - 2016/12/1
N2 - In normal hearing subjects, detection of near-threshold tones in noise is influenced by signal certainty. Thus, tones that are presented more frequently than others, and/or are preceded by a clearly audible cue tone of the same frequency (target tones) are detected better than other tones (probe tones). This auditory attentional filter was examined in six cochlear implant (CI) recipients, using acoustic stimuli and direct programmed electrode stimulation. Three of the subjects showed no evidence of an attentional filter. Three subjects showed a relatively higher detection rate of the target frequency or electrode stimulated during the attentional task, and in two of these subjects the target benefit was influenced by stimulus certainty. The absence of an attentional filter in some CI recipients is consistent with suggestions that the attentional filter may be generated by efferent modulation of outer hair cells, which would presumably be absent in CI recipients, however, the presence of some frequency-selective attentional effects and a near-normal attentional filter in two CI subjects imply that central processes can modulate signal detection in CI recipients according to stimulus certainty. Such central processes might serve as a neural substrate to improve signal detection in CI recipients.
AB - In normal hearing subjects, detection of near-threshold tones in noise is influenced by signal certainty. Thus, tones that are presented more frequently than others, and/or are preceded by a clearly audible cue tone of the same frequency (target tones) are detected better than other tones (probe tones). This auditory attentional filter was examined in six cochlear implant (CI) recipients, using acoustic stimuli and direct programmed electrode stimulation. Three of the subjects showed no evidence of an attentional filter. Three subjects showed a relatively higher detection rate of the target frequency or electrode stimulated during the attentional task, and in two of these subjects the target benefit was influenced by stimulus certainty. The absence of an attentional filter in some CI recipients is consistent with suggestions that the attentional filter may be generated by efferent modulation of outer hair cells, which would presumably be absent in CI recipients, however, the presence of some frequency-selective attentional effects and a near-normal attentional filter in two CI subjects imply that central processes can modulate signal detection in CI recipients according to stimulus certainty. Such central processes might serve as a neural substrate to improve signal detection in CI recipients.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85000963072&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1121/1.4968783
DO - 10.1121/1.4968783
M3 - Article
C2 - 28040033
AN - SCOPUS:85000963072
SN - 0001-4966
VL - 140
SP - 4091
EP - 4100
JO - Journal of Acoustical Society of America
JF - Journal of Acoustical Society of America
IS - 6
ER -