Selected predictors of junior doctor performance in their first postgraduate year: what matters most, their demographics, personal attributes, selection scores or academic performance?

Research output: ThesisDoctoral Thesis

Abstract

This thesis explored the proposition that emotionally intelligent, female medical students, with high scores in UMAT section 2, who have performed well on measures of academic achievement will be better prepared for practice as junior doctors, as measured by the Western Australian Junior Doctor Assessment Tool in the first post graduate year.

This exploration has taken place through a series of publications representing interconnected mixed methods research projects utilising the same sample of medical students from one university as they moved through the last three years of their undergraduate medical course and during the first postgraduate year of practice as a doctor.

The proposition explored is partially supported with emotionally intelligent students who have performed well on measures of academic achievement obtaining higher performance scores as junior doctors when measured by the Junior Doctor Assessment Tool. These findings were further reflected in the participants’ supervisors’ qualitative ratings of performance in the first post graduate year.

This research supports the claim that the tools and processes being used to monitor and assess junior doctor performance need to be better addressed and adds to the growing body of knowledge that suggests assessment of academic performance in medical school is not always aligned with assessing generic graduate outcomes expected of the junior doctor in the workplace. The findings provide support to the value of combining undergraduate assessment scores to assess competence as a whole in predicting future performance as a junior doctor.

LanguageEnglish
QualificationDoctor of Philosophy
StateUnpublished - 2014

Fingerprint

performance
graduate
academic achievement
medical student
research project
workplace
rating
university
school
knowledge
student

Cite this

@phdthesis{f674d30a09e24841979ade60199cd820,
title = "Selected predictors of junior doctor performance in their first postgraduate year: what matters most, their demographics, personal attributes, selection scores or academic performance?",
abstract = "This thesis explored the proposition that emotionally intelligent, female medical students, with high scores in UMAT section 2, who have performed well on measures of academic achievement will be better prepared for practice as junior doctors, as measured by the Western Australian Junior Doctor Assessment Tool in the first post graduate year. This exploration has taken place through a series of publications representing interconnected mixed methods research projects utilising the same sample of medical students from one university as they moved through the last three years of their undergraduate medical course and during the first postgraduate year of practice as a doctor. The proposition explored is partially supported with emotionally intelligent students who have performed well on measures of academic achievement obtaining higher performance scores as junior doctors when measured by the Junior Doctor Assessment Tool. These findings were further reflected in the participants’ supervisors’ qualitative ratings of performance in the first post graduate year. This research supports the claim that the tools and processes being used to monitor and assess junior doctor performance need to be better addressed and adds to the growing body of knowledge that suggests assessment of academic performance in medical school is not always aligned with assessing generic graduate outcomes expected of the junior doctor in the workplace. The findings provide support to the value of combining undergraduate assessment scores to assess competence as a whole in predicting future performance as a junior doctor.",
keywords = "Predictors, Junior doctors, Work place based, Assessment",
author = "Sandra Carr",
year = "2014",
language = "English",

}

TY - THES

T1 - Selected predictors of junior doctor performance in their first postgraduate year: what matters most, their demographics, personal attributes, selection scores or academic performance?

AU - Carr,Sandra

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - This thesis explored the proposition that emotionally intelligent, female medical students, with high scores in UMAT section 2, who have performed well on measures of academic achievement will be better prepared for practice as junior doctors, as measured by the Western Australian Junior Doctor Assessment Tool in the first post graduate year. This exploration has taken place through a series of publications representing interconnected mixed methods research projects utilising the same sample of medical students from one university as they moved through the last three years of their undergraduate medical course and during the first postgraduate year of practice as a doctor. The proposition explored is partially supported with emotionally intelligent students who have performed well on measures of academic achievement obtaining higher performance scores as junior doctors when measured by the Junior Doctor Assessment Tool. These findings were further reflected in the participants’ supervisors’ qualitative ratings of performance in the first post graduate year. This research supports the claim that the tools and processes being used to monitor and assess junior doctor performance need to be better addressed and adds to the growing body of knowledge that suggests assessment of academic performance in medical school is not always aligned with assessing generic graduate outcomes expected of the junior doctor in the workplace. The findings provide support to the value of combining undergraduate assessment scores to assess competence as a whole in predicting future performance as a junior doctor.

AB - This thesis explored the proposition that emotionally intelligent, female medical students, with high scores in UMAT section 2, who have performed well on measures of academic achievement will be better prepared for practice as junior doctors, as measured by the Western Australian Junior Doctor Assessment Tool in the first post graduate year. This exploration has taken place through a series of publications representing interconnected mixed methods research projects utilising the same sample of medical students from one university as they moved through the last three years of their undergraduate medical course and during the first postgraduate year of practice as a doctor. The proposition explored is partially supported with emotionally intelligent students who have performed well on measures of academic achievement obtaining higher performance scores as junior doctors when measured by the Junior Doctor Assessment Tool. These findings were further reflected in the participants’ supervisors’ qualitative ratings of performance in the first post graduate year. This research supports the claim that the tools and processes being used to monitor and assess junior doctor performance need to be better addressed and adds to the growing body of knowledge that suggests assessment of academic performance in medical school is not always aligned with assessing generic graduate outcomes expected of the junior doctor in the workplace. The findings provide support to the value of combining undergraduate assessment scores to assess competence as a whole in predicting future performance as a junior doctor.

KW - Predictors

KW - Junior doctors

KW - Work place based

KW - Assessment

M3 - Doctoral Thesis

ER -