Science Communication as a Collective Intelligence Endeavor: A Manifesto and Examples for Implementation

Dawn Holford; Angelo Fasce; Katy Tapper; Miso Demko; Stephan Lewandowsky; Ulrike Hahn; Christoph M. Abels; Ahmed Al-Rawi; Sameer Alladin; T. Sonia Boender; Hendrik Bruns; Helen Fischer; Christian Gilde; Paul H. P. Hanel; Stefan M. Herzog; Astrid Kause; Sune Lehmann; Matthew S. Nurse; Caroline Orr; Niccolo Pescetelli; Maria Petrescu; Sunita Sah; Philipp Schmid; Miroslav Sirota; Marlene Wulf

doi:10.1177/10755470231162634

Science Communication as a Collective Intelligence Endeavor: A Manifesto and Examples for Implementation

Dawn Holford, Angelo Fasce, Katy Tapper, Miso Demko, Stephan Lewandowsky, Ulrike Hahn, Christoph M. Abels, Ahmed Al-Rawi, Sameer Alladin, T. Sonia Boender, Hendrik Bruns, Helen Fischer, Christian Gilde, Paul H. P. Hanel, Stefan M. Herzog, Astrid Kause, Sune Lehmann, Matthew S. Nurse, Caroline Orr, Niccolo PescetelliMaria Petrescu, Sunita Sah, Philipp Schmid, Miroslav Sirota, Marlene Wulf

Research output: Contribution to journal › Editorial › peer-review

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Effective science communication is challenging when scientific messages are informed by a continually updating evidence base and must often compete against misinformation. We argue that we need a new program of science communication as collective intelligence-a collaborative approach, supported by technology. This would have four key advantages over the typical model where scientists communicate as individuals: scientific messages would be informed by (a) a wider base of aggregated knowledge, (b) contributions from a diverse scientific community, (c) participatory input from stakeholders, and (d) better responsiveness to ongoing changes in the state of knowledge.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	539-554
Number of pages	16
Journal	Science Communication
Volume	45
Issue number	4
Early online date	Apr 2023
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1177/10755470231162634
Publication status	Published - Aug 2023
Externally published	Yes

Access to Document

10.1177/10755470231162634Licence: CC BY

Cite this

Holford, D., Fasce, A., Tapper, K., Demko, M., Lewandowsky, S., Hahn, U., Abels, C. M., Al-Rawi, A., Alladin, S., Boender, T. S., Bruns, H., Fischer, H., Gilde, C., Hanel, P. H. P., Herzog, S. M., Kause, A., Lehmann, S., Nurse, M. S., Orr, C., ... Wulf, M. (2023). Science Communication as a Collective Intelligence Endeavor: A Manifesto and Examples for Implementation. Science Communication, 45(4), 539-554. https://doi.org/10.1177/10755470231162634

@article{8fda9a58b2e5405d9ac35ed738ced8de,

title = "Science Communication as a Collective Intelligence Endeavor: A Manifesto and Examples for Implementation",

abstract = "Effective science communication is challenging when scientific messages are informed by a continually updating evidence base and must often compete against misinformation. We argue that we need a new program of science communication as collective intelligence-a collaborative approach, supported by technology. This would have four key advantages over the typical model where scientists communicate as individuals: scientific messages would be informed by (a) a wider base of aggregated knowledge, (b) contributions from a diverse scientific community, (c) participatory input from stakeholders, and (d) better responsiveness to ongoing changes in the state of knowledge.",

keywords = "Collective intelligence, Epistemic diversity, Knowledge aggregation, Knowledge updating, Participatory input, Science communication",

author = "Dawn Holford and Angelo Fasce and Katy Tapper and Miso Demko and Stephan Lewandowsky and Ulrike Hahn and Abels, \{Christoph M.\} and Ahmed Al-Rawi and Sameer Alladin and Boender, \{T. Sonia\} and Hendrik Bruns and Helen Fischer and Christian Gilde and Hanel, \{Paul H. P.\} and Herzog, \{Stefan M.\} and Astrid Kause and Sune Lehmann and Nurse, \{Matthew S.\} and Caroline Orr and Niccolo Pescetelli and Maria Petrescu and Sunita Sah and Philipp Schmid and Miroslav Sirota and Marlene Wulf",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} The Author(s) 2023.",

year = "2023",

month = aug,

doi = "10.1177/10755470231162634",

language = "English",

volume = "45",

pages = "539--554",

journal = "Science Communication",

issn = "1075-5470",

publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",

number = "4",

}

Holford, D, Fasce, A, Tapper, K, Demko, M, Lewandowsky, S, Hahn, U, Abels, CM, Al-Rawi, A, Alladin, S, Boender, TS, Bruns, H, Fischer, H, Gilde, C, Hanel, PHP, Herzog, SM, Kause, A, Lehmann, S, Nurse, MS, Orr, C, Pescetelli, N, Petrescu, M, Sah, S, Schmid, P, Sirota, M & Wulf, M 2023, 'Science Communication as a Collective Intelligence Endeavor: A Manifesto and Examples for Implementation', Science Communication, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 539-554. https://doi.org/10.1177/10755470231162634

TY - JOUR

T1 - Science Communication as a Collective Intelligence Endeavor

T2 - A Manifesto and Examples for Implementation

AU - Holford, Dawn

AU - Fasce, Angelo

AU - Tapper, Katy

AU - Demko, Miso

AU - Lewandowsky, Stephan

AU - Hahn, Ulrike

AU - Abels, Christoph M.

AU - Al-Rawi, Ahmed

AU - Alladin, Sameer

AU - Boender, T. Sonia

AU - Bruns, Hendrik

AU - Fischer, Helen

AU - Gilde, Christian

AU - Hanel, Paul H. P.

AU - Herzog, Stefan M.

AU - Kause, Astrid

AU - Lehmann, Sune

AU - Nurse, Matthew S.

AU - Orr, Caroline

AU - Pescetelli, Niccolo

AU - Petrescu, Maria

AU - Sah, Sunita

AU - Schmid, Philipp

AU - Sirota, Miroslav

AU - Wulf, Marlene

PY - 2023/8

Y1 - 2023/8

N2 - Effective science communication is challenging when scientific messages are informed by a continually updating evidence base and must often compete against misinformation. We argue that we need a new program of science communication as collective intelligence-a collaborative approach, supported by technology. This would have four key advantages over the typical model where scientists communicate as individuals: scientific messages would be informed by (a) a wider base of aggregated knowledge, (b) contributions from a diverse scientific community, (c) participatory input from stakeholders, and (d) better responsiveness to ongoing changes in the state of knowledge.

AB - Effective science communication is challenging when scientific messages are informed by a continually updating evidence base and must often compete against misinformation. We argue that we need a new program of science communication as collective intelligence-a collaborative approach, supported by technology. This would have four key advantages over the typical model where scientists communicate as individuals: scientific messages would be informed by (a) a wider base of aggregated knowledge, (b) contributions from a diverse scientific community, (c) participatory input from stakeholders, and (d) better responsiveness to ongoing changes in the state of knowledge.

KW - Collective intelligence

KW - Epistemic diversity

KW - Knowledge aggregation

KW - Knowledge updating

KW - Participatory input

KW - Science communication

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85152895225

U2 - 10.1177/10755470231162634

DO - 10.1177/10755470231162634

M3 - Editorial

C2 - 37994373

SN - 1075-5470

VL - 45

SP - 539

EP - 554

JO - Science Communication

JF - Science Communication

IS - 4

ER -

Science Communication as a Collective Intelligence Endeavor: A Manifesto and Examples for Implementation

Abstract

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint