School English, literature and the knowledge-base question

Lyn Yates, Larissa Mclean Davies, Lucy Buzacott, Brenton Doecke, Philip Mead, Wayne Sawyer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This article takes up questions about knowledge and the school curriculum with respect to literary studies within subject English. Its intention is to focus on literary studies in English from the context of current waves of curriculum reform, rather than as part of the conversations primarily within the field of English, to raise questions about the knowledge agenda, and the knowledge-base agenda for teaching and teacher education. The selection of texts and form of study of literature within the English curriculum has long been an area of controversy. Without assuming a particular position on knowledge in this area, this article shows that important questions of what knowledge-base teachers are expected to bring to their work are elided both in current regulations and debates, and in research on ‘good teaching’ in this area. If ‘literary studies’ (as a discipline or university major) is itself an unstable and changing field, what kind of knowledge does a good English teacher bring to their work? This paper takes up these questions in the context of the Australian Curriculum and standards for teacher registration, but it also points to the way these issues about knowledge are of broader relevance for researchers and teacher education.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)51-68
Number of pages18
JournalThe Curriculum Journal
Volume30
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Fingerprint

English literature
teacher
curriculum
school
Teaching
education
conversation
regulation
reform
university

Cite this

Yates, L., Davies, L. M., Buzacott, L., Doecke, B., Mead, P., & Sawyer, W. (2019). School English, literature and the knowledge-base question. The Curriculum Journal, 30(1), 51-68. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585176.2018.1543603
Yates, Lyn ; Davies, Larissa Mclean ; Buzacott, Lucy ; Doecke, Brenton ; Mead, Philip ; Sawyer, Wayne. / School English, literature and the knowledge-base question. In: The Curriculum Journal. 2019 ; Vol. 30, No. 1. pp. 51-68.
@article{0cbb2d01bb8b412ab44bd5a13270769c,
title = "School English, literature and the knowledge-base question",
abstract = "This article takes up questions about knowledge and the school curriculum with respect to literary studies within subject English. Its intention is to focus on literary studies in English from the context of current waves of curriculum reform, rather than as part of the conversations primarily within the field of English, to raise questions about the knowledge agenda, and the knowledge-base agenda for teaching and teacher education. The selection of texts and form of study of literature within the English curriculum has long been an area of controversy. Without assuming a particular position on knowledge in this area, this article shows that important questions of what knowledge-base teachers are expected to bring to their work are elided both in current regulations and debates, and in research on ‘good teaching’ in this area. If ‘literary studies’ (as a discipline or university major) is itself an unstable and changing field, what kind of knowledge does a good English teacher bring to their work? This paper takes up these questions in the context of the Australian Curriculum and standards for teacher registration, but it also points to the way these issues about knowledge are of broader relevance for researchers and teacher education.",
author = "Lyn Yates and Davies, {Larissa Mclean} and Lucy Buzacott and Brenton Doecke and Philip Mead and Wayne Sawyer",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1080/09585176.2018.1543603",
language = "English",
volume = "30",
pages = "51--68",
journal = "The Curriculum Journal",
issn = "0958-5176",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "1",

}

Yates, L, Davies, LM, Buzacott, L, Doecke, B, Mead, P & Sawyer, W 2019, 'School English, literature and the knowledge-base question' The Curriculum Journal, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 51-68. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585176.2018.1543603

School English, literature and the knowledge-base question. / Yates, Lyn; Davies, Larissa Mclean; Buzacott, Lucy; Doecke, Brenton; Mead, Philip; Sawyer, Wayne.

In: The Curriculum Journal, Vol. 30, No. 1, 2019, p. 51-68.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - School English, literature and the knowledge-base question

AU - Yates, Lyn

AU - Davies, Larissa Mclean

AU - Buzacott, Lucy

AU - Doecke, Brenton

AU - Mead, Philip

AU - Sawyer, Wayne

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - This article takes up questions about knowledge and the school curriculum with respect to literary studies within subject English. Its intention is to focus on literary studies in English from the context of current waves of curriculum reform, rather than as part of the conversations primarily within the field of English, to raise questions about the knowledge agenda, and the knowledge-base agenda for teaching and teacher education. The selection of texts and form of study of literature within the English curriculum has long been an area of controversy. Without assuming a particular position on knowledge in this area, this article shows that important questions of what knowledge-base teachers are expected to bring to their work are elided both in current regulations and debates, and in research on ‘good teaching’ in this area. If ‘literary studies’ (as a discipline or university major) is itself an unstable and changing field, what kind of knowledge does a good English teacher bring to their work? This paper takes up these questions in the context of the Australian Curriculum and standards for teacher registration, but it also points to the way these issues about knowledge are of broader relevance for researchers and teacher education.

AB - This article takes up questions about knowledge and the school curriculum with respect to literary studies within subject English. Its intention is to focus on literary studies in English from the context of current waves of curriculum reform, rather than as part of the conversations primarily within the field of English, to raise questions about the knowledge agenda, and the knowledge-base agenda for teaching and teacher education. The selection of texts and form of study of literature within the English curriculum has long been an area of controversy. Without assuming a particular position on knowledge in this area, this article shows that important questions of what knowledge-base teachers are expected to bring to their work are elided both in current regulations and debates, and in research on ‘good teaching’ in this area. If ‘literary studies’ (as a discipline or university major) is itself an unstable and changing field, what kind of knowledge does a good English teacher bring to their work? This paper takes up these questions in the context of the Australian Curriculum and standards for teacher registration, but it also points to the way these issues about knowledge are of broader relevance for researchers and teacher education.

U2 - 10.1080/09585176.2018.1543603

DO - 10.1080/09585176.2018.1543603

M3 - Article

VL - 30

SP - 51

EP - 68

JO - The Curriculum Journal

JF - The Curriculum Journal

SN - 0958-5176

IS - 1

ER -