Rural workforce challenges: Why not rural psychiatry?

William Darmawan, Catherine Harding, Mathew Coleman, Anthony Samuels

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective The Australian psychiatry workforce is under-subscribed and highly urbanised. Currently, 90% of psychiatrists work in the cities, and there are significant projected workforce shortages of psychiatrists throughout Australia, particularly in rural and remote locations. This qualitative study explores factors influencing medical students and junior doctors' decisions to pursue a career in rural psychiatry. Method Using a phenomenological approach, data were collected through semi-structured interviews and focus groups and subjected to thematic analysis. Results Sixteen participants were interviewed, 11 interviewees and five participants from two focus groups. This study identified enablers and challenges in pursuing rural psychiatry training in Australia. Clinical exposure to rural psychiatry, personal factors, rural lifestyle and workforce shortage awareness were identified as enablers. The lack of rural infrastructure, the attractiveness of urban psychiatry and the stigma toward rural psychiatry were identified as barriers. Conclusions Australian rural psychiatry workforce remains a complex issue. Reinforcing enablers and addressing barriers identified in this study would benefit future rural workforce initiatives.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)8-12
Number of pages5
JournalAustralasian Psychiatry
Volume31
Issue number1
Early online date10 Nov 2022
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2023

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Rural workforce challenges: Why not rural psychiatry?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this