Rural medical marriages: Understanding symbolic violence in the social practice of gender

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This article examines the social practice of gender amongst rural GPs and in rural medical marriages and considers Bourdieu’s notions of symbolic violence and misrecognition important elements in understanding how inequitable gender relations are sustained and reproduced. Drawing on ethnographic research conducted in rural Western Australia amongst GPs and their spouses/partners I explore the notion that gender as a structural or organising principle impacts on expectations and experiences of roles in the workplace and in the home. Compliance with conventional views of male as provider and female as primary caregiver raises questions about the advantages of conformity and the costs of challenge. Nonetheless, contesting dominant ideas and practices that do not serve the interests of non-dominant groups may well cause conflict but can lead to change.
LanguageEnglish
Pages73-86
JournalWomen's Studies International Forum
Volume31
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2008

Fingerprint

symbolic violence
marriage
violence
gender
gender relations
conformity
workplace
spouse
caregiver
compliance
cause
costs
cost
experience
Group
conflict

Cite this

@article{bc64b12ee8774b03baf986d6e135c88c,
title = "Rural medical marriages: Understanding symbolic violence in the social practice of gender",
abstract = "This article examines the social practice of gender amongst rural GPs and in rural medical marriages and considers Bourdieu’s notions of symbolic violence and misrecognition important elements in understanding how inequitable gender relations are sustained and reproduced. Drawing on ethnographic research conducted in rural Western Australia amongst GPs and their spouses/partners I explore the notion that gender as a structural or organising principle impacts on expectations and experiences of roles in the workplace and in the home. Compliance with conventional views of male as provider and female as primary caregiver raises questions about the advantages of conformity and the costs of challenge. Nonetheless, contesting dominant ideas and practices that do not serve the interests of non-dominant groups may well cause conflict but can lead to change.",
author = "Angela Durey",
year = "2008",
doi = "10.1016/j.wsif.2007.11.003",
language = "English",
volume = "31",
pages = "73--86",
journal = "WOMENS STUDIES INTERNATIONAL FORUM",
issn = "0277-5395",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "1",

}

Rural medical marriages: Understanding symbolic violence in the social practice of gender. / Durey, Angela.

In: Women's Studies International Forum, Vol. 31, No. 1, 2008, p. 73-86.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Rural medical marriages: Understanding symbolic violence in the social practice of gender

AU - Durey,Angela

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - This article examines the social practice of gender amongst rural GPs and in rural medical marriages and considers Bourdieu’s notions of symbolic violence and misrecognition important elements in understanding how inequitable gender relations are sustained and reproduced. Drawing on ethnographic research conducted in rural Western Australia amongst GPs and their spouses/partners I explore the notion that gender as a structural or organising principle impacts on expectations and experiences of roles in the workplace and in the home. Compliance with conventional views of male as provider and female as primary caregiver raises questions about the advantages of conformity and the costs of challenge. Nonetheless, contesting dominant ideas and practices that do not serve the interests of non-dominant groups may well cause conflict but can lead to change.

AB - This article examines the social practice of gender amongst rural GPs and in rural medical marriages and considers Bourdieu’s notions of symbolic violence and misrecognition important elements in understanding how inequitable gender relations are sustained and reproduced. Drawing on ethnographic research conducted in rural Western Australia amongst GPs and their spouses/partners I explore the notion that gender as a structural or organising principle impacts on expectations and experiences of roles in the workplace and in the home. Compliance with conventional views of male as provider and female as primary caregiver raises questions about the advantages of conformity and the costs of challenge. Nonetheless, contesting dominant ideas and practices that do not serve the interests of non-dominant groups may well cause conflict but can lead to change.

U2 - 10.1016/j.wsif.2007.11.003

DO - 10.1016/j.wsif.2007.11.003

M3 - Article

VL - 31

SP - 73

EP - 86

JO - WOMENS STUDIES INTERNATIONAL FORUM

T2 - WOMENS STUDIES INTERNATIONAL FORUM

JF - WOMENS STUDIES INTERNATIONAL FORUM

SN - 0277-5395

IS - 1

ER -