Rock art as art

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

For a long time, art historians have developed a restrictive view of the phenomenon of art and have participated in the creation of a Eurocentric vision of global human history. Effectively, art history became a reflection of the wider framework of European cultural dominance, colonial exploitation and appropriation. A key notion in this respect is, for example, the idea of ‘primitive art’. One could argue that these configurations are still dominant within art history, so that the latter is regarded as being of limited value from the perspective of comparative social science disciplines, such as archaeology, rock art studies and social anthropology. However, recently, new developments within and from outside of the field have increasingly criticised and questioned the dominant orientation of art history. These include the challenge that is presented by indigenous artists, their voices and perspectives, an engagement with recent social theoretical debates (such as the ‘ontological turn’) and ongoing discussions about the fundamental character of (anthropological) inquiry itself and the similarities to writing and, more broadly, artistic creation. This paper explores how these diverse tendencies can be beneficial within the study of rock art and archaeology.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)153-164
Number of pages12
JournalTime and Mind
Volume12
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 3 Apr 2019

Fingerprint

art history
art
archaeology
art studies
cultural anthropology
artist
historian
exploitation
social science
Rock Art
Art
Art History
history
Archaeology
Ontological
Human History
Social Sciences
Artistic Creation
Fundamental
Colonies

Cite this

Porr, Martin. / Rock art as art. In: Time and Mind. 2019 ; Vol. 12, No. 2. pp. 153-164.
@article{9f4778b17c504b2a8b3936f662754e8e,
title = "Rock art as art",
abstract = "For a long time, art historians have developed a restrictive view of the phenomenon of art and have participated in the creation of a Eurocentric vision of global human history. Effectively, art history became a reflection of the wider framework of European cultural dominance, colonial exploitation and appropriation. A key notion in this respect is, for example, the idea of ‘primitive art’. One could argue that these configurations are still dominant within art history, so that the latter is regarded as being of limited value from the perspective of comparative social science disciplines, such as archaeology, rock art studies and social anthropology. However, recently, new developments within and from outside of the field have increasingly criticised and questioned the dominant orientation of art history. These include the challenge that is presented by indigenous artists, their voices and perspectives, an engagement with recent social theoretical debates (such as the ‘ontological turn’) and ongoing discussions about the fundamental character of (anthropological) inquiry itself and the similarities to writing and, more broadly, artistic creation. This paper explores how these diverse tendencies can be beneficial within the study of rock art and archaeology.",
keywords = "art history, epistemology, interdisciplinarity, research history, Rock art",
author = "Martin Porr",
year = "2019",
month = "4",
day = "3",
doi = "10.1080/1751696X.2019.1609799",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
pages = "153--164",
journal = "Time and Mind",
issn = "1751-696X",
publisher = "Berg Publishers",
number = "2",

}

Rock art as art. / Porr, Martin.

In: Time and Mind, Vol. 12, No. 2, 03.04.2019, p. 153-164.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Rock art as art

AU - Porr, Martin

PY - 2019/4/3

Y1 - 2019/4/3

N2 - For a long time, art historians have developed a restrictive view of the phenomenon of art and have participated in the creation of a Eurocentric vision of global human history. Effectively, art history became a reflection of the wider framework of European cultural dominance, colonial exploitation and appropriation. A key notion in this respect is, for example, the idea of ‘primitive art’. One could argue that these configurations are still dominant within art history, so that the latter is regarded as being of limited value from the perspective of comparative social science disciplines, such as archaeology, rock art studies and social anthropology. However, recently, new developments within and from outside of the field have increasingly criticised and questioned the dominant orientation of art history. These include the challenge that is presented by indigenous artists, their voices and perspectives, an engagement with recent social theoretical debates (such as the ‘ontological turn’) and ongoing discussions about the fundamental character of (anthropological) inquiry itself and the similarities to writing and, more broadly, artistic creation. This paper explores how these diverse tendencies can be beneficial within the study of rock art and archaeology.

AB - For a long time, art historians have developed a restrictive view of the phenomenon of art and have participated in the creation of a Eurocentric vision of global human history. Effectively, art history became a reflection of the wider framework of European cultural dominance, colonial exploitation and appropriation. A key notion in this respect is, for example, the idea of ‘primitive art’. One could argue that these configurations are still dominant within art history, so that the latter is regarded as being of limited value from the perspective of comparative social science disciplines, such as archaeology, rock art studies and social anthropology. However, recently, new developments within and from outside of the field have increasingly criticised and questioned the dominant orientation of art history. These include the challenge that is presented by indigenous artists, their voices and perspectives, an engagement with recent social theoretical debates (such as the ‘ontological turn’) and ongoing discussions about the fundamental character of (anthropological) inquiry itself and the similarities to writing and, more broadly, artistic creation. This paper explores how these diverse tendencies can be beneficial within the study of rock art and archaeology.

KW - art history

KW - epistemology

KW - interdisciplinarity

KW - research history

KW - Rock art

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85067601199&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/1751696X.2019.1609799

DO - 10.1080/1751696X.2019.1609799

M3 - Article

VL - 12

SP - 153

EP - 164

JO - Time and Mind

JF - Time and Mind

SN - 1751-696X

IS - 2

ER -