TY - JOUR
T1 - Robust scanning of AEM data for IP effects
AU - Viezzoli, Andrea
AU - Dauti, Francesco
AU - Wijns, Chris
N1 - Funding Information:
This project has received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme [grant agreement number 776487]. We thank First Quantum Minerals Ltd for providing the AEM dataset.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Australian Society of Exploration Geophysicists.
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - The industry has widely accepted that AEM data are more frequently affected by induced polarisation (IP) effects than previously acknowledged. However, we still lack a clear understanding of how much, where, and when IP is present. Full modelling of airborne IP (AIP) is time and computationally intensive. As an alternative, we derive a novel tool, the “AIP scanner”, based on a combination of extensive data–space and limited model–space analysis. The basic assumption is that failing to model IP, when present, increases AEM inversion misfits. Several data space metrics, on negatives and on decay rates, are correlated to misfit from inversion ignoring IP over a small portion of the dataset. The correlation is used to predict the presence of AIP over the entire dataset. The last step is a recursive comparison between the map of predicted AIP and the results of full AIP modelling over a few selected lines. The resulting “AIP scanner” map indicates areas of definite AIP effects, areas possibly affected, and areas probably unaffected by AIP. Such maps are extremely useful tools for the exploration industry wishing to leverage AEM data information content. A case study from South Australia illustrates the scanner results relative to mapped geology and demonstrates the relationships between chargeability and the often unpredictable consequences for the resistivity inversions.
AB - The industry has widely accepted that AEM data are more frequently affected by induced polarisation (IP) effects than previously acknowledged. However, we still lack a clear understanding of how much, where, and when IP is present. Full modelling of airborne IP (AIP) is time and computationally intensive. As an alternative, we derive a novel tool, the “AIP scanner”, based on a combination of extensive data–space and limited model–space analysis. The basic assumption is that failing to model IP, when present, increases AEM inversion misfits. Several data space metrics, on negatives and on decay rates, are correlated to misfit from inversion ignoring IP over a small portion of the dataset. The correlation is used to predict the presence of AIP over the entire dataset. The last step is a recursive comparison between the map of predicted AIP and the results of full AIP modelling over a few selected lines. The resulting “AIP scanner” map indicates areas of definite AIP effects, areas possibly affected, and areas probably unaffected by AIP. Such maps are extremely useful tools for the exploration industry wishing to leverage AEM data information content. A case study from South Australia illustrates the scanner results relative to mapped geology and demonstrates the relationships between chargeability and the often unpredictable consequences for the resistivity inversions.
KW - Airborne electromagmetics
KW - conductivity
KW - exploration methodologies
KW - induced polarisation
KW - modelling
KW - processing
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85099863355&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/08123985.2020.1856624
DO - 10.1080/08123985.2020.1856624
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85099863355
SN - 0812-3985
VL - 52
SP - 563
EP - 574
JO - Exploration Geophysics
JF - Exploration Geophysics
IS - 5
ER -