Retinal imaging with optical coherence tomography and low-loss adaptive optics using a 2.8-mm beam size

Reddikumar Maddipatla, Joel Cervantes, Yukitoshi Otani, Barry Cense

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

As data acquisition for retinal imaging with optical coherence tomography (OCT) becomes faster, efficient collection of photons becomes more important to maintain image quality. One approach is to use a larger aperture at the eye's pupil to collect more photons that have been reflected from the retina. A 2.8-mm beam diameter system with only seven reflecting surfaces was developed for low-loss retinal imaging. The larger beam size requires defocus and astigmatism correction, which was done in a closed loop adaptive optics method using a Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensor and a deformable mirror (DM) with 140 actuators and a ±2.75 μm stroke. This DM facilitates defocus correction ranging from approximately −3 D to +3 D. Comparing the new system with a standard 1.2-mm system on a model eye, a signal-to-noise gain of 4.5 dB and a 2.3 times smaller speckle size were measured. Measurements on the retinas of five subjects showed even better results, with increases in dynamic range up to 13 dB. Note that the new sample arm only occupies 30 cm × 60 cm, which makes it highly suitable for imaging in a clinical environment. Figure: B-scan images obtained over a width of 8 deg from the right eye of a 31-year-old Caucasian male. While the left side was imaged with a standard 1.2-mm OCT system, the right side was imaged with the 2.8-mm system. Both images were collected with the same integration time and incident power, after correction of aberrations. Using the dynamic range within the images, which is determined by comparing the highest pixel value to the noise floor, a difference in dynamic range of 10.8 dB was measured between the two systems.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere201800192
JournalJournal of Biophotonics
Volume12
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2019

Fingerprint

Adaptive optics
Optical tomography
Optical Coherence Tomography
adaptive optics
tomography
dynamic range
Photons
Imaging techniques
Retina
retina
deformable mirrors
Mirrors
Astigmatism
Wavefronts
Pupil
Speckle
Aberrations
Image quality
astigmatism
Noise

Cite this

@article{4903335854d94236bd52109d7c81ca47,
title = "Retinal imaging with optical coherence tomography and low-loss adaptive optics using a 2.8-mm beam size",
abstract = "As data acquisition for retinal imaging with optical coherence tomography (OCT) becomes faster, efficient collection of photons becomes more important to maintain image quality. One approach is to use a larger aperture at the eye's pupil to collect more photons that have been reflected from the retina. A 2.8-mm beam diameter system with only seven reflecting surfaces was developed for low-loss retinal imaging. The larger beam size requires defocus and astigmatism correction, which was done in a closed loop adaptive optics method using a Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensor and a deformable mirror (DM) with 140 actuators and a ±2.75 μm stroke. This DM facilitates defocus correction ranging from approximately −3 D to +3 D. Comparing the new system with a standard 1.2-mm system on a model eye, a signal-to-noise gain of 4.5 dB and a 2.3 times smaller speckle size were measured. Measurements on the retinas of five subjects showed even better results, with increases in dynamic range up to 13 dB. Note that the new sample arm only occupies 30 cm × 60 cm, which makes it highly suitable for imaging in a clinical environment. Figure: B-scan images obtained over a width of 8 deg from the right eye of a 31-year-old Caucasian male. While the left side was imaged with a standard 1.2-mm OCT system, the right side was imaged with the 2.8-mm system. Both images were collected with the same integration time and incident power, after correction of aberrations. Using the dynamic range within the images, which is determined by comparing the highest pixel value to the noise floor, a difference in dynamic range of 10.8 dB was measured between the two systems.",
keywords = "adaptive optics, optical coherence tomography, retinal imaging, wavefront sensing, wavefront shaping",
author = "Reddikumar Maddipatla and Joel Cervantes and Yukitoshi Otani and Barry Cense",
year = "2019",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/jbio.201800192",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
journal = "Journal of Biophotonics",
issn = "1864-0648",
publisher = "Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA",
number = "6",

}

Retinal imaging with optical coherence tomography and low-loss adaptive optics using a 2.8-mm beam size. / Maddipatla, Reddikumar; Cervantes, Joel; Otani, Yukitoshi; Cense, Barry.

In: Journal of Biophotonics, Vol. 12, No. 6, e201800192, 01.06.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Retinal imaging with optical coherence tomography and low-loss adaptive optics using a 2.8-mm beam size

AU - Maddipatla, Reddikumar

AU - Cervantes, Joel

AU - Otani, Yukitoshi

AU - Cense, Barry

PY - 2019/6/1

Y1 - 2019/6/1

N2 - As data acquisition for retinal imaging with optical coherence tomography (OCT) becomes faster, efficient collection of photons becomes more important to maintain image quality. One approach is to use a larger aperture at the eye's pupil to collect more photons that have been reflected from the retina. A 2.8-mm beam diameter system with only seven reflecting surfaces was developed for low-loss retinal imaging. The larger beam size requires defocus and astigmatism correction, which was done in a closed loop adaptive optics method using a Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensor and a deformable mirror (DM) with 140 actuators and a ±2.75 μm stroke. This DM facilitates defocus correction ranging from approximately −3 D to +3 D. Comparing the new system with a standard 1.2-mm system on a model eye, a signal-to-noise gain of 4.5 dB and a 2.3 times smaller speckle size were measured. Measurements on the retinas of five subjects showed even better results, with increases in dynamic range up to 13 dB. Note that the new sample arm only occupies 30 cm × 60 cm, which makes it highly suitable for imaging in a clinical environment. Figure: B-scan images obtained over a width of 8 deg from the right eye of a 31-year-old Caucasian male. While the left side was imaged with a standard 1.2-mm OCT system, the right side was imaged with the 2.8-mm system. Both images were collected with the same integration time and incident power, after correction of aberrations. Using the dynamic range within the images, which is determined by comparing the highest pixel value to the noise floor, a difference in dynamic range of 10.8 dB was measured between the two systems.

AB - As data acquisition for retinal imaging with optical coherence tomography (OCT) becomes faster, efficient collection of photons becomes more important to maintain image quality. One approach is to use a larger aperture at the eye's pupil to collect more photons that have been reflected from the retina. A 2.8-mm beam diameter system with only seven reflecting surfaces was developed for low-loss retinal imaging. The larger beam size requires defocus and astigmatism correction, which was done in a closed loop adaptive optics method using a Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensor and a deformable mirror (DM) with 140 actuators and a ±2.75 μm stroke. This DM facilitates defocus correction ranging from approximately −3 D to +3 D. Comparing the new system with a standard 1.2-mm system on a model eye, a signal-to-noise gain of 4.5 dB and a 2.3 times smaller speckle size were measured. Measurements on the retinas of five subjects showed even better results, with increases in dynamic range up to 13 dB. Note that the new sample arm only occupies 30 cm × 60 cm, which makes it highly suitable for imaging in a clinical environment. Figure: B-scan images obtained over a width of 8 deg from the right eye of a 31-year-old Caucasian male. While the left side was imaged with a standard 1.2-mm OCT system, the right side was imaged with the 2.8-mm system. Both images were collected with the same integration time and incident power, after correction of aberrations. Using the dynamic range within the images, which is determined by comparing the highest pixel value to the noise floor, a difference in dynamic range of 10.8 dB was measured between the two systems.

KW - adaptive optics

KW - optical coherence tomography

KW - retinal imaging

KW - wavefront sensing

KW - wavefront shaping

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85062775226&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/jbio.201800192

DO - 10.1002/jbio.201800192

M3 - Article

VL - 12

JO - Journal of Biophotonics

JF - Journal of Biophotonics

SN - 1864-0648

IS - 6

M1 - e201800192

ER -