TY - JOUR
T1 - Restitution, Unjust Enrichment and Domestic Caregiving
AU - Cooney, Henry
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - In Gill v Garrett [2020] NSWSC 795, Slattery J considered a claim in unjust enrichment in which a domestic caregiver sought restitution for the value of caregiving services. While the claimant was unsuccessful, Slattery J’s decision provides several helpful insights into the manner in which courts approach these sorts of claims. This case note explores some of these insights. Its aim is to examine the challenges that may be faced by a domestic caregiver who seeks restitution for the value of caregiving services conferred upon a domestic recipient.
AB - In Gill v Garrett [2020] NSWSC 795, Slattery J considered a claim in unjust enrichment in which a domestic caregiver sought restitution for the value of caregiving services. While the claimant was unsuccessful, Slattery J’s decision provides several helpful insights into the manner in which courts approach these sorts of claims. This case note explores some of these insights. Its aim is to examine the challenges that may be faced by a domestic caregiver who seeks restitution for the value of caregiving services conferred upon a domestic recipient.
UR - https://www.utas.edu.au/law/research/university-of-tasmania-law-review
U2 - 10.2139/ssrn.4040730
DO - 10.2139/ssrn.4040730
M3 - Article
SN - 0082-2108
VL - 40
JO - University of Tasmania Law Review
JF - University of Tasmania Law Review
IS - 2
M1 - 174
ER -