Response to low-dose herbicide selection in self-pollinated Avena fatua

Roberto Busi, Marcello Girotto, Stephen B. Powles

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

27 Citations (Scopus)


© 2015 Society of Chemical Industry. BACKGROUND: When applied at the correct plant stage and dose, herbicides are highly toxic to plants. At reduced, low herbicide doses (below the recommended dose) plants can survive and display continuous and quantitative variation in dose-survival responses. Recurrent (directional) selection studies can reveal whether such a phenotypic variation in plant survival response to low herbicide dose is heritable and leads to herbicide resistance. In a common experimental garden study, we have subjected a susceptible population of self-pollinated hexaploid Avena fatua to low-dose recurrent selection with the ACCase-inhibiting herbicide diclofop-methyl for three consecutive generations. RESULTS: Significant differences in response to low-dose diclofop-methyl selection were observed between the selected progenies and parent plants, with a twofold diclofop-methyl resistance and cross-resistance to ALS-inhibiting herbicides. Thus, the capacity of self-pollinated A. fatua to respond to low-dose herbicide selection is marginal, and it is much lower than in cross-pollinated L. rigidum. Lolium rigidum in the same experiment evolved 40-fold diclofop-methyl resistance by progressive enrichment of quantitative resistance-endowing traits. CONCLUSION: Cross-pollination rate, genetic variation and ploidy levels are identified as possible drivers affecting the contrasting capacity of Avena versus Lolium plants to respond to herbicide selection and the subsequent likelihood of resistance evolution at low herbicide dose usage.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)603-608
Number of pages6
JournalPest Management Science
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2016


Dive into the research topics of 'Response to low-dose herbicide selection in self-pollinated Avena fatua'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this