Response of sunflower to strategies of irrigation. I. Growth, yield and the efficiency of water-use

David Connor, Terry R Jones, Jairo Palta

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

55 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The progressive growth and water-use of twelve treatments of sunflower subjected to a range of irrigation sequences were measured throughout their growing season. The treatments included late-start and early=stop sequences, strategic irrigation and controls that were either irrigated weekly to maintain potential evapotranspiration or were reliant on rainfall. In the 2 years of experimentation, growing-season rainfall and Class-A pan evaporation were 121, 92 and 804, 798 mm respectively. The two control treatments set the boundaries to yield which ranged between 1.1 and 4.5 t/ha all at 48.3% oil content. The efficiency of water-use in the production of seed (EEs) ranged from 4.0 kg/ha mm−1 for the rainfed control to 8.0 kg/ha mm−1 which was achieved by a treatment in which a 2-weekly watering schedule was maintained from budding to maturity. Other strategically irrigated treatments also had water-use efficiencies in excess of that of the weekly irrigated control. Analysis of the seasonal progression of water-use shows that the major contributor to higher water-use efficiency in the sub-optimally irrigated treatments was a reduction in soil evaporation in which the responsiveness of leaf area to water supply played an important role. The efficiency of use of transpired water in the production of biomass (ETb) was constant across all but one treatment in which weekly irrigation was commenced at budding. In this treatment there was a significant (P<0.05) increase in ETb relative to the other crops (24.3 vs. 20.8 kg/ha mm−1). Early vegetative growth was readily manipulable by delayed irrigation which conserved water for the seed filling period and improved yield by an increase in harvest index.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)15-36
JournalField Crops Research
Volume10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1985
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

irrigation management
water use efficiency
Helianthus annuus
irrigation
filling period
evaporation
growing season
rain
water
harvest index
water supply
vegetative growth
evapotranspiration
biomass production
leaf area
lipid content
crops
soil

Cite this

@article{59a501d7e90e4e1eade6b23958d10eeb,
title = "Response of sunflower to strategies of irrigation. I. Growth, yield and the efficiency of water-use",
abstract = "The progressive growth and water-use of twelve treatments of sunflower subjected to a range of irrigation sequences were measured throughout their growing season. The treatments included late-start and early=stop sequences, strategic irrigation and controls that were either irrigated weekly to maintain potential evapotranspiration or were reliant on rainfall. In the 2 years of experimentation, growing-season rainfall and Class-A pan evaporation were 121, 92 and 804, 798 mm respectively. The two control treatments set the boundaries to yield which ranged between 1.1 and 4.5 t/ha all at 48.3{\%} oil content. The efficiency of water-use in the production of seed (EEs) ranged from 4.0 kg/ha mm−1 for the rainfed control to 8.0 kg/ha mm−1 which was achieved by a treatment in which a 2-weekly watering schedule was maintained from budding to maturity. Other strategically irrigated treatments also had water-use efficiencies in excess of that of the weekly irrigated control. Analysis of the seasonal progression of water-use shows that the major contributor to higher water-use efficiency in the sub-optimally irrigated treatments was a reduction in soil evaporation in which the responsiveness of leaf area to water supply played an important role. The efficiency of use of transpired water in the production of biomass (ETb) was constant across all but one treatment in which weekly irrigation was commenced at budding. In this treatment there was a significant (P<0.05) increase in ETb relative to the other crops (24.3 vs. 20.8 kg/ha mm−1). Early vegetative growth was readily manipulable by delayed irrigation which conserved water for the seed filling period and improved yield by an increase in harvest index.",
author = "David Connor and Jones, {Terry R} and Jairo Palta",
year = "1985",
doi = "10.1016/0378-4290(85)90003-6",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "15--36",
journal = "Field Crop Research",
issn = "0378-4290",
publisher = "Pergamon",

}

Response of sunflower to strategies of irrigation. I. Growth, yield and the efficiency of water-use. / Connor, David; Jones, Terry R; Palta, Jairo.

In: Field Crops Research, Vol. 10, 1985, p. 15-36.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Response of sunflower to strategies of irrigation. I. Growth, yield and the efficiency of water-use

AU - Connor, David

AU - Jones, Terry R

AU - Palta, Jairo

PY - 1985

Y1 - 1985

N2 - The progressive growth and water-use of twelve treatments of sunflower subjected to a range of irrigation sequences were measured throughout their growing season. The treatments included late-start and early=stop sequences, strategic irrigation and controls that were either irrigated weekly to maintain potential evapotranspiration or were reliant on rainfall. In the 2 years of experimentation, growing-season rainfall and Class-A pan evaporation were 121, 92 and 804, 798 mm respectively. The two control treatments set the boundaries to yield which ranged between 1.1 and 4.5 t/ha all at 48.3% oil content. The efficiency of water-use in the production of seed (EEs) ranged from 4.0 kg/ha mm−1 for the rainfed control to 8.0 kg/ha mm−1 which was achieved by a treatment in which a 2-weekly watering schedule was maintained from budding to maturity. Other strategically irrigated treatments also had water-use efficiencies in excess of that of the weekly irrigated control. Analysis of the seasonal progression of water-use shows that the major contributor to higher water-use efficiency in the sub-optimally irrigated treatments was a reduction in soil evaporation in which the responsiveness of leaf area to water supply played an important role. The efficiency of use of transpired water in the production of biomass (ETb) was constant across all but one treatment in which weekly irrigation was commenced at budding. In this treatment there was a significant (P<0.05) increase in ETb relative to the other crops (24.3 vs. 20.8 kg/ha mm−1). Early vegetative growth was readily manipulable by delayed irrigation which conserved water for the seed filling period and improved yield by an increase in harvest index.

AB - The progressive growth and water-use of twelve treatments of sunflower subjected to a range of irrigation sequences were measured throughout their growing season. The treatments included late-start and early=stop sequences, strategic irrigation and controls that were either irrigated weekly to maintain potential evapotranspiration or were reliant on rainfall. In the 2 years of experimentation, growing-season rainfall and Class-A pan evaporation were 121, 92 and 804, 798 mm respectively. The two control treatments set the boundaries to yield which ranged between 1.1 and 4.5 t/ha all at 48.3% oil content. The efficiency of water-use in the production of seed (EEs) ranged from 4.0 kg/ha mm−1 for the rainfed control to 8.0 kg/ha mm−1 which was achieved by a treatment in which a 2-weekly watering schedule was maintained from budding to maturity. Other strategically irrigated treatments also had water-use efficiencies in excess of that of the weekly irrigated control. Analysis of the seasonal progression of water-use shows that the major contributor to higher water-use efficiency in the sub-optimally irrigated treatments was a reduction in soil evaporation in which the responsiveness of leaf area to water supply played an important role. The efficiency of use of transpired water in the production of biomass (ETb) was constant across all but one treatment in which weekly irrigation was commenced at budding. In this treatment there was a significant (P<0.05) increase in ETb relative to the other crops (24.3 vs. 20.8 kg/ha mm−1). Early vegetative growth was readily manipulable by delayed irrigation which conserved water for the seed filling period and improved yield by an increase in harvest index.

U2 - 10.1016/0378-4290(85)90003-6

DO - 10.1016/0378-4290(85)90003-6

M3 - Article

VL - 10

SP - 15

EP - 36

JO - Field Crop Research

JF - Field Crop Research

SN - 0378-4290

ER -