Representing weather-year variation in whole-farm optimisation models: Four-stage single-sequence vs eight-stage multi-sequence

Michael Young, John Young, Ross S. Kingwell, Philip E Vercoe

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The trade-off between accuracy and complexity is a common issue faced in farm systems analysis. To provide insights into the importance of representing weather-year sequence in farm modelling, two whole-farm optimisation models are constructed and applied to a mixed enterprise farming system in a subregion of Western Australia. The frameworks are (i) four-stage single-sequence stochastic programming with recourse (4-SPR) to capture weather-year variation and management tactics tailored to each weather-year and (ii) eight-stage multi-sequence stochastic programming with recourse (8-SPR) to outline weather-year sequences and management tactics tailored to particular weather-year sequences. Results show that single-year stochastic programming generates similar expected profit and strategic management as multi-year stochastic programming. However, optimal tactical farm management is affected by the outcome of the previous year. Tactical decision-making in response to the outcome of the preceding weather-year increases profitability by 14%. Technology changes over the last decade, particularly the increase in computer speed and computational power, increase the ease of construction and application of the 4-SPR and 8-SPR frameworks. Nonetheless, choosing which framework is best to apply to a particular issue or opportunity remains a challenge.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)44-59
Number of pages16
JournalAustralian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics
Volume68
Issue number1
Early online date2023
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2024

Cite this