Replacement of Parts and Patent Infringement

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

What does it mean to infringe a patent by “making”? And when an invention has replaceable parts – ink cartridges, bottles, razor blades, etc – is replacement an act of making, or an act of repair? This note tackles these questions by reference to the leading UK Supreme Court decision, Schütz v Werit (2013).
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)518-521
JournalCambridge Law Journal
Volume72
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2013

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Replacement of Parts and Patent Infringement'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this