Reinterpreting olive bud dormancy

Mercedes Arias-Sibillotte; Michael J. Considine; Santiago Signorelli

doi:10.1093/jxb/erae353

Reinterpreting olive bud dormancy

Mercedes Arias-Sibillotte
, Michael J. Considine
, Santiago Signorelli

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Current evidence suggests that olive buds do not undergo physiological dormancy; however, the parallel processes of floral induction and bud quiescence may share conserved molecular pathways, which possibly confounds interpretation of existing data

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	6017-6021
Number of pages	5
Journal	Journal of Experimental Botany
Volume	75
Issue number	19
Early online date	14 Sept 2024
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erae353
Publication status	Published - 16 Oct 2024

Funding

Funders	Funder number
ARC Australian Research Council	DP210102178

Access to Document

10.1093/jxb/erae353Licence: CC BY

Cite this

@article{dc5631992aee413884ce41efa0a3c530,

title = "Reinterpreting olive bud dormancy",

abstract = "Current evidence suggests that olive buds do not undergo physiological dormancy; however, the parallel processes of floral induction and bud quiescence may share conserved molecular pathways, which possibly confounds interpretation of existing data",

keywords = "Bud, dormancy, flowering, olive, quiescence",

author = "Mercedes Arias-Sibillotte and Considine, \{Michael J.\} and Santiago Signorelli",

year = "2024",

month = oct,

day = "16",

doi = "10.1093/jxb/erae353",

language = "English",

volume = "75",

pages = "6017--6021",

journal = "Journal of Experimental Botany",

issn = "0022-0957",

publisher = "Oxford University Press",

number = "19",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reinterpreting olive bud dormancy

AU - Arias-Sibillotte, Mercedes

AU - Considine, Michael J.

AU - Signorelli, Santiago

PY - 2024/10/16

Y1 - 2024/10/16

N2 - Current evidence suggests that olive buds do not undergo physiological dormancy; however, the parallel processes of floral induction and bud quiescence may share conserved molecular pathways, which possibly confounds interpretation of existing data

AB - Current evidence suggests that olive buds do not undergo physiological dormancy; however, the parallel processes of floral induction and bud quiescence may share conserved molecular pathways, which possibly confounds interpretation of existing data

KW - Bud

KW - dormancy

KW - flowering

KW - olive

KW - quiescence

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85207261696

U2 - 10.1093/jxb/erae353

DO - 10.1093/jxb/erae353

M3 - Article

C2 - 39168817

AN - SCOPUS:85207261696

SN - 0022-0957

VL - 75

SP - 6017

EP - 6021

JO - Journal of Experimental Botany

JF - Journal of Experimental Botany

IS - 19

ER -

Reinterpreting olive bud dormancy

Abstract

Funding

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Ascorbate and glutathione integrate the control of grapevine development

Cite this

Reinterpreting olive bud dormancy

Abstract

Funding

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Projects

Ascorbate and glutathione integrate the control of grapevine development

Cite this