Regulation of Australia's Resources Sector: Submission to Inquiry by Productivity Commission

Research output: Other contribution

75 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

John Southalan and Joe Fardin provided a submission to the Productivity Commission inquiry into Resources Sector Regulation. The submission identified issues regarding best-practice arrangements and urged a broadening scope of study. In summary, the submission:
• identified best-practice issues for the Commission to examine in its inquiry;
• encouraged the Commission to explicitly identify how non-financial aspects feature in its inquiry and analysis, which should include the principles of ecologically sustainable development;
• recommended broadening the scope of study – which would be within the Treasurer’s terms of reference and, more importantly, align with the Commission’s contribution to better ‘policies in the long-term interest of the Australian community’ and also government approaches of regulatory impact assessment;
• urged the inclusion of renewable energy within the Commission’s assessment of ‘resources’, given that renewables have some substitutability for coal and therefore make the Commission’s focus on the latter, if quarantined from the broader context, a skewed analysis focussing on the status quo;
• explained why the ‘life cycle of a resources project’, and government regulation of that, begins prior to exploration; and
• emphasised that public involvement should not be envisaged as community acceptance and involvement within a pre-determined resources project – instead, community engagement must be part of planning and decision-making from the beginning, as evident from contemporary practice by resources companies and also international standards.
Original languageEnglish
TypeSubmission
Media of outputDocument
PublisherProductivity Commission
Number of pages23
Publication statusPublished - 7 Nov 2019

Fingerprint

productivity
regulation
resources
best practice
community
renewable energy
coal
life cycle
sustainable development
acceptance
inclusion
decision making
planning

Cite this

@misc{24dc6fc621914cc4a9d5413d9ce13769,
title = "Regulation of Australia's Resources Sector: Submission to Inquiry by Productivity Commission",
abstract = "John Southalan and Joe Fardin provided a submission to the Productivity Commission inquiry into Resources Sector Regulation. The submission identified issues regarding best-practice arrangements and urged a broadening scope of study. In summary, the submission: • identified best-practice issues for the Commission to examine in its inquiry;• encouraged the Commission to explicitly identify how non-financial aspects feature in its inquiry and analysis, which should include the principles of ecologically sustainable development;• recommended broadening the scope of study – which would be within the Treasurer’s terms of reference and, more importantly, align with the Commission’s contribution to better ‘policies in the long-term interest of the Australian community’ and also government approaches of regulatory impact assessment;• urged the inclusion of renewable energy within the Commission’s assessment of ‘resources’, given that renewables have some substitutability for coal and therefore make the Commission’s focus on the latter, if quarantined from the broader context, a skewed analysis focussing on the status quo;• explained why the ‘life cycle of a resources project’, and government regulation of that, begins prior to exploration; and• emphasised that public involvement should not be envisaged as community acceptance and involvement within a pre-determined resources project – instead, community engagement must be part of planning and decision-making from the beginning, as evident from contemporary practice by resources companies and also international standards.",
author = "John Southalan and Joe Fardin",
year = "2019",
month = "11",
day = "7",
language = "English",
publisher = "Productivity Commission",
type = "Other",

}

Regulation of Australia's Resources Sector : Submission to Inquiry by Productivity Commission. / Southalan, John; Fardin, Joe.

23 p. Productivity Commission. 2019, Submission.

Research output: Other contribution

TY - GEN

T1 - Regulation of Australia's Resources Sector

T2 - Submission to Inquiry by Productivity Commission

AU - Southalan, John

AU - Fardin, Joe

PY - 2019/11/7

Y1 - 2019/11/7

N2 - John Southalan and Joe Fardin provided a submission to the Productivity Commission inquiry into Resources Sector Regulation. The submission identified issues regarding best-practice arrangements and urged a broadening scope of study. In summary, the submission: • identified best-practice issues for the Commission to examine in its inquiry;• encouraged the Commission to explicitly identify how non-financial aspects feature in its inquiry and analysis, which should include the principles of ecologically sustainable development;• recommended broadening the scope of study – which would be within the Treasurer’s terms of reference and, more importantly, align with the Commission’s contribution to better ‘policies in the long-term interest of the Australian community’ and also government approaches of regulatory impact assessment;• urged the inclusion of renewable energy within the Commission’s assessment of ‘resources’, given that renewables have some substitutability for coal and therefore make the Commission’s focus on the latter, if quarantined from the broader context, a skewed analysis focussing on the status quo;• explained why the ‘life cycle of a resources project’, and government regulation of that, begins prior to exploration; and• emphasised that public involvement should not be envisaged as community acceptance and involvement within a pre-determined resources project – instead, community engagement must be part of planning and decision-making from the beginning, as evident from contemporary practice by resources companies and also international standards.

AB - John Southalan and Joe Fardin provided a submission to the Productivity Commission inquiry into Resources Sector Regulation. The submission identified issues regarding best-practice arrangements and urged a broadening scope of study. In summary, the submission: • identified best-practice issues for the Commission to examine in its inquiry;• encouraged the Commission to explicitly identify how non-financial aspects feature in its inquiry and analysis, which should include the principles of ecologically sustainable development;• recommended broadening the scope of study – which would be within the Treasurer’s terms of reference and, more importantly, align with the Commission’s contribution to better ‘policies in the long-term interest of the Australian community’ and also government approaches of regulatory impact assessment;• urged the inclusion of renewable energy within the Commission’s assessment of ‘resources’, given that renewables have some substitutability for coal and therefore make the Commission’s focus on the latter, if quarantined from the broader context, a skewed analysis focussing on the status quo;• explained why the ‘life cycle of a resources project’, and government regulation of that, begins prior to exploration; and• emphasised that public involvement should not be envisaged as community acceptance and involvement within a pre-determined resources project – instead, community engagement must be part of planning and decision-making from the beginning, as evident from contemporary practice by resources companies and also international standards.

M3 - Other contribution

PB - Productivity Commission

ER -