Reef accessibility impairs the protection of sharks

Jean Baptiste Juhel, Laurent Vigliola, David Mouillot, Michel Kulbicki, Tom B. Letessier, Jessica J. Meeuwig, Laurent Wantiez

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Reef sharks are declining world-wide under ever-increasing fishing pressure, with potential consequences on ecosystem functioning. Marine protected areas (MPAs) are currently one of the management tools used to counteract the pervasive impacts of fishing. However, MPAs in which reef sharks are abundant tend to be located in remote and underexploited areas, preventing a fair assessment of management effectiveness beyond remoteness from human activities. Here, we determine the conditions under which MPAs can effectively protect sharks along a wide gradient of reef accessibility, from the vicinity of a regional capital towards remote areas, using 385 records from baited remote underwater video systems and 2,790 underwater visual censuses performed in areas open to fishing and inside 15 MPAs across New Caledonia (South-Western Pacific). We show that even one of the world's oldest (43 years), largest (172 km2) and most restrictive (no-entry) MPA (Merlet reserve) on coral reefs has between 17.3% and 45.3% fewer shark species and between 37.2% and 79.8% fewer shark abundance than remote areas in a context where sharks are not historically exploited. On coral reefs situated at less than 1 hr of travel time from humans, shark populations are so low in abundance (less than 0.05 individuals per 1,000 m2) that their functional roles are severely limited. Synthesis and applications. Remote areas are the last sanctuaries for reef sharks, providing a new baseline from which to evaluate human impacts on the species. However, there is no equivalent close to human activities even in large, old and strongly restrictive marine protected areas. As such sharks deserve strong protection efforts. The large, no-entry marine protected areas, close to humans, offer limited benefits for reef shark populations, but provide more realistic conservation targets for managers of human-dominated reefs. The exclusion of human activities on a sufficiently large area is key to protect reef shark populations. However, this strategy remains difficult to apply in many countries critically depending on reef resources for food security or livelihood.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)673-683
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Applied Ecology
Volume55
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2018

Fingerprint

shark
accessibility
reef
protected area
fishing
human activity
coral reef
functional role
food security
anthropogenic effect
travel time
census
ecosystem

Cite this

Juhel, Jean Baptiste ; Vigliola, Laurent ; Mouillot, David ; Kulbicki, Michel ; Letessier, Tom B. ; Meeuwig, Jessica J. ; Wantiez, Laurent. / Reef accessibility impairs the protection of sharks. In: Journal of Applied Ecology. 2018 ; Vol. 55, No. 2. pp. 673-683.
@article{b229a5da04484562ba2b0cf5b699398f,
title = "Reef accessibility impairs the protection of sharks",
abstract = "Reef sharks are declining world-wide under ever-increasing fishing pressure, with potential consequences on ecosystem functioning. Marine protected areas (MPAs) are currently one of the management tools used to counteract the pervasive impacts of fishing. However, MPAs in which reef sharks are abundant tend to be located in remote and underexploited areas, preventing a fair assessment of management effectiveness beyond remoteness from human activities. Here, we determine the conditions under which MPAs can effectively protect sharks along a wide gradient of reef accessibility, from the vicinity of a regional capital towards remote areas, using 385 records from baited remote underwater video systems and 2,790 underwater visual censuses performed in areas open to fishing and inside 15 MPAs across New Caledonia (South-Western Pacific). We show that even one of the world's oldest (43 years), largest (172 km2) and most restrictive (no-entry) MPA (Merlet reserve) on coral reefs has between 17.3{\%} and 45.3{\%} fewer shark species and between 37.2{\%} and 79.8{\%} fewer shark abundance than remote areas in a context where sharks are not historically exploited. On coral reefs situated at less than 1 hr of travel time from humans, shark populations are so low in abundance (less than 0.05 individuals per 1,000 m2) that their functional roles are severely limited. Synthesis and applications. Remote areas are the last sanctuaries for reef sharks, providing a new baseline from which to evaluate human impacts on the species. However, there is no equivalent close to human activities even in large, old and strongly restrictive marine protected areas. As such sharks deserve strong protection efforts. The large, no-entry marine protected areas, close to humans, offer limited benefits for reef shark populations, but provide more realistic conservation targets for managers of human-dominated reefs. The exclusion of human activities on a sufficiently large area is key to protect reef shark populations. However, this strategy remains difficult to apply in many countries critically depending on reef resources for food security or livelihood.",
keywords = "baited remote underwater video system, baseline, coral reef, Elasmobranch, human impact, human proximity, marine protected area, reef shark, underwater visual census",
author = "Juhel, {Jean Baptiste} and Laurent Vigliola and David Mouillot and Michel Kulbicki and Letessier, {Tom B.} and Meeuwig, {Jessica J.} and Laurent Wantiez",
year = "2018",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/1365-2664.13007",
language = "English",
volume = "55",
pages = "673--683",
journal = "Journal of Applied Ecology: ecology with management relevance",
issn = "0021-8901",
publisher = "John Wiley & Sons",
number = "2",

}

Juhel, JB, Vigliola, L, Mouillot, D, Kulbicki, M, Letessier, TB, Meeuwig, JJ & Wantiez, L 2018, 'Reef accessibility impairs the protection of sharks' Journal of Applied Ecology, vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 673-683. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.13007

Reef accessibility impairs the protection of sharks. / Juhel, Jean Baptiste; Vigliola, Laurent; Mouillot, David; Kulbicki, Michel; Letessier, Tom B.; Meeuwig, Jessica J.; Wantiez, Laurent.

In: Journal of Applied Ecology, Vol. 55, No. 2, 01.03.2018, p. 673-683.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reef accessibility impairs the protection of sharks

AU - Juhel, Jean Baptiste

AU - Vigliola, Laurent

AU - Mouillot, David

AU - Kulbicki, Michel

AU - Letessier, Tom B.

AU - Meeuwig, Jessica J.

AU - Wantiez, Laurent

PY - 2018/3/1

Y1 - 2018/3/1

N2 - Reef sharks are declining world-wide under ever-increasing fishing pressure, with potential consequences on ecosystem functioning. Marine protected areas (MPAs) are currently one of the management tools used to counteract the pervasive impacts of fishing. However, MPAs in which reef sharks are abundant tend to be located in remote and underexploited areas, preventing a fair assessment of management effectiveness beyond remoteness from human activities. Here, we determine the conditions under which MPAs can effectively protect sharks along a wide gradient of reef accessibility, from the vicinity of a regional capital towards remote areas, using 385 records from baited remote underwater video systems and 2,790 underwater visual censuses performed in areas open to fishing and inside 15 MPAs across New Caledonia (South-Western Pacific). We show that even one of the world's oldest (43 years), largest (172 km2) and most restrictive (no-entry) MPA (Merlet reserve) on coral reefs has between 17.3% and 45.3% fewer shark species and between 37.2% and 79.8% fewer shark abundance than remote areas in a context where sharks are not historically exploited. On coral reefs situated at less than 1 hr of travel time from humans, shark populations are so low in abundance (less than 0.05 individuals per 1,000 m2) that their functional roles are severely limited. Synthesis and applications. Remote areas are the last sanctuaries for reef sharks, providing a new baseline from which to evaluate human impacts on the species. However, there is no equivalent close to human activities even in large, old and strongly restrictive marine protected areas. As such sharks deserve strong protection efforts. The large, no-entry marine protected areas, close to humans, offer limited benefits for reef shark populations, but provide more realistic conservation targets for managers of human-dominated reefs. The exclusion of human activities on a sufficiently large area is key to protect reef shark populations. However, this strategy remains difficult to apply in many countries critically depending on reef resources for food security or livelihood.

AB - Reef sharks are declining world-wide under ever-increasing fishing pressure, with potential consequences on ecosystem functioning. Marine protected areas (MPAs) are currently one of the management tools used to counteract the pervasive impacts of fishing. However, MPAs in which reef sharks are abundant tend to be located in remote and underexploited areas, preventing a fair assessment of management effectiveness beyond remoteness from human activities. Here, we determine the conditions under which MPAs can effectively protect sharks along a wide gradient of reef accessibility, from the vicinity of a regional capital towards remote areas, using 385 records from baited remote underwater video systems and 2,790 underwater visual censuses performed in areas open to fishing and inside 15 MPAs across New Caledonia (South-Western Pacific). We show that even one of the world's oldest (43 years), largest (172 km2) and most restrictive (no-entry) MPA (Merlet reserve) on coral reefs has between 17.3% and 45.3% fewer shark species and between 37.2% and 79.8% fewer shark abundance than remote areas in a context where sharks are not historically exploited. On coral reefs situated at less than 1 hr of travel time from humans, shark populations are so low in abundance (less than 0.05 individuals per 1,000 m2) that their functional roles are severely limited. Synthesis and applications. Remote areas are the last sanctuaries for reef sharks, providing a new baseline from which to evaluate human impacts on the species. However, there is no equivalent close to human activities even in large, old and strongly restrictive marine protected areas. As such sharks deserve strong protection efforts. The large, no-entry marine protected areas, close to humans, offer limited benefits for reef shark populations, but provide more realistic conservation targets for managers of human-dominated reefs. The exclusion of human activities on a sufficiently large area is key to protect reef shark populations. However, this strategy remains difficult to apply in many countries critically depending on reef resources for food security or livelihood.

KW - baited remote underwater video system

KW - baseline

KW - coral reef

KW - Elasmobranch

KW - human impact

KW - human proximity

KW - marine protected area

KW - reef shark

KW - underwater visual census

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85041957298&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/1365-2664.13007

DO - 10.1111/1365-2664.13007

M3 - Article

VL - 55

SP - 673

EP - 683

JO - Journal of Applied Ecology: ecology with management relevance

JF - Journal of Applied Ecology: ecology with management relevance

SN - 0021-8901

IS - 2

ER -