Abstract
The precautionary principle is a legal principle that has found considerable
support in international environmental law. Its emergence, however, has not
been without problems and controversies: how do we define its normative
content and trigger elements, and how do we ensure concrete implementation.
The 2011 Seabed Mining Advisory Opinion used states’ due diligence obligations
to prevent harm to realize the precautionary principle. Focusing on this case,
this article examines how the precautionary principle can be applied using the
concept of due diligence. First, this article explores the precautionary concept
using examples from a selection of regional and multilateral environmental
instruments, analyzing its origin and different expressions and identifying the
problems in its application. Second, the article analyzes the Pulp Mills case and
the Seabed Mining Advisory Opinion to substantiate the role of the obligation to
take precautionary measures in the legal framework of due diligence. Third, by
reference to the International Law Commission’s Draft Articles on Prevention
of Transboundary Harm from Hazardous Activities and the International Law
Association’s study report on the Legal Principles relating to Climate Change,
along with a number of international cases, the article further illustrates the
distinction between due diligence, prevention and precaution and argues that
they are actually interrelated.
support in international environmental law. Its emergence, however, has not
been without problems and controversies: how do we define its normative
content and trigger elements, and how do we ensure concrete implementation.
The 2011 Seabed Mining Advisory Opinion used states’ due diligence obligations
to prevent harm to realize the precautionary principle. Focusing on this case,
this article examines how the precautionary principle can be applied using the
concept of due diligence. First, this article explores the precautionary concept
using examples from a selection of regional and multilateral environmental
instruments, analyzing its origin and different expressions and identifying the
problems in its application. Second, the article analyzes the Pulp Mills case and
the Seabed Mining Advisory Opinion to substantiate the role of the obligation to
take precautionary measures in the legal framework of due diligence. Third, by
reference to the International Law Commission’s Draft Articles on Prevention
of Transboundary Harm from Hazardous Activities and the International Law
Association’s study report on the Legal Principles relating to Climate Change,
along with a number of international cases, the article further illustrates the
distinction between due diligence, prevention and precaution and argues that
they are actually interrelated.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | Dalhousie Journal of Legal Studies |
| Volume | 25 |
| Publication status | Published - 2016 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Realizing the Precautionary Principle in Due Diligence'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver