Re-evaluating model assumptions suggests that Australian birds are more tolerant of heat and aridity than predicted: A response to Conradie et al. (2020)

Hector Pacheco-Fuentes; Christine E. Cooper; Philip C. Withers; Simon C. Griffith

doi:10.1093/conphys/coac010

Re-evaluating model assumptions suggests that Australian birds are more tolerant of heat and aridity than predicted: A response to Conradie et al. (2020)

Hector Pacheco-Fuentes, Christine E. Cooper, Philip C. Withers, Simon C. Griffith

School of Biological Sciences

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Conradie et al. (2020) recently modelled the vulnerability of Australian arid birds to a changing climate. While the approach used by Conradie et al. (2020) is valuable, we argue that key assumptions in their study are poorly supported and the risks of a changing climate to arid zone avifauna are consequently overstated.

Original language	English
Article number	coac010
Journal	Conservation Physiology
Volume	10
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1093/conphys/coac010
Publication status	Published - 10 Mar 2022

Access to Document

10.1093/conphys/coac010Licence: CC BY

Cite this

@article{d7d3179e1fed4b4ca4adb3508e6701d6,

title = "Re-evaluating model assumptions suggests that Australian birds are more tolerant of heat and aridity than predicted: A response to Conradie et al. (2020)",

abstract = "Conradie et al. (2020) recently modelled the vulnerability of Australian arid birds to a changing climate. While the approach used by Conradie et al. (2020) is valuable, we argue that key assumptions in their study are poorly supported and the risks of a changing climate to arid zone avifauna are consequently overstated. ",

author = "Hector Pacheco-Fuentes and Cooper, {Christine E.} and Withers, {Philip C.} and Griffith, {Simon C.}",

year = "2022",

month = mar,

day = "10",

doi = "10.1093/conphys/coac010",

language = "English",

volume = "10",

journal = "Conservation Physiology",

issn = "2051-1434",

publisher = "Oxford University Press",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Re-evaluating model assumptions suggests that Australian birds are more tolerant of heat and aridity than predicted

T2 - A response to Conradie et al. (2020)

AU - Pacheco-Fuentes, Hector

AU - Cooper, Christine E.

AU - Withers, Philip C.

AU - Griffith, Simon C.

PY - 2022/3/10

Y1 - 2022/3/10

N2 - Conradie et al. (2020) recently modelled the vulnerability of Australian arid birds to a changing climate. While the approach used by Conradie et al. (2020) is valuable, we argue that key assumptions in their study are poorly supported and the risks of a changing climate to arid zone avifauna are consequently overstated.

AB - Conradie et al. (2020) recently modelled the vulnerability of Australian arid birds to a changing climate. While the approach used by Conradie et al. (2020) is valuable, we argue that key assumptions in their study are poorly supported and the risks of a changing climate to arid zone avifauna are consequently overstated.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85127520332&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/conphys/coac010

DO - 10.1093/conphys/coac010

M3 - Article

C2 - 35492422

AN - SCOPUS:85127520332

VL - 10

JO - Conservation Physiology

JF - Conservation Physiology

SN - 2051-1434

IS - 1

M1 - coac010

ER -

Re-evaluating model assumptions suggests that Australian birds are more tolerant of heat and aridity than predicted: A response to Conradie et al. (2020)

Abstract

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this