Rankings in professional men's tennis: a rich but underutilized source of information

Machar Reid, S.W. Morgan, T. Churchill, M.K. Bane

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    14 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Success in professional tennis is measured, at least in part, by rankings. However, there is little quantitative evidence to inform stakeholders regarding what represents the typical ranking progress of top-ranked players. The objective of this study was therefore to compare the ranking trajectories of male players whom achieved peak professional rankings in the Top 250, 175, 100, 50, 20 and 10. The 11,396 birthdates and weekly professional rankings of all players between 27 August 1973 and 31 October 2011 were collated. The peak ranks for each athlete according to their both chronological age and number of years on tour were identified and athletes were categorised into one of six career-peak ranking bands. One-way analysis of variance tests confirmed distinctive ranking trajectories, which were most pronounced among Top 10 players. The rankings of these players were statistically distinguishable following players' second year on tour or by 17 years of age. The ranking signature of all Top 100 players emerged as significantly different to players that failed to enter the Top 100 by their fourth year on the tour. Indeed, the representation of ranking as a function of years on tour should be considered for use by tennis policy-makers in the future. © 2014 Crown Copyright.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)986-992
    JournalJournal of Sports Sciences
    Volume32
    Issue number10
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2014

    Fingerprint

    Tennis
    Athletes
    Administrative Personnel
    Crowns
    Analysis of Variance

    Cite this

    Reid, Machar ; Morgan, S.W. ; Churchill, T. ; Bane, M.K. / Rankings in professional men's tennis: a rich but underutilized source of information. In: Journal of Sports Sciences. 2014 ; Vol. 32, No. 10. pp. 986-992.
    @article{e94d41b955e54d57a52d954a1fb0c328,
    title = "Rankings in professional men's tennis: a rich but underutilized source of information",
    abstract = "Success in professional tennis is measured, at least in part, by rankings. However, there is little quantitative evidence to inform stakeholders regarding what represents the typical ranking progress of top-ranked players. The objective of this study was therefore to compare the ranking trajectories of male players whom achieved peak professional rankings in the Top 250, 175, 100, 50, 20 and 10. The 11,396 birthdates and weekly professional rankings of all players between 27 August 1973 and 31 October 2011 were collated. The peak ranks for each athlete according to their both chronological age and number of years on tour were identified and athletes were categorised into one of six career-peak ranking bands. One-way analysis of variance tests confirmed distinctive ranking trajectories, which were most pronounced among Top 10 players. The rankings of these players were statistically distinguishable following players' second year on tour or by 17 years of age. The ranking signature of all Top 100 players emerged as significantly different to players that failed to enter the Top 100 by their fourth year on the tour. Indeed, the representation of ranking as a function of years on tour should be considered for use by tennis policy-makers in the future. {\circledC} 2014 Crown Copyright.",
    author = "Machar Reid and S.W. Morgan and T. Churchill and M.K. Bane",
    year = "2014",
    doi = "10.1080/02640414.2013.876086",
    language = "English",
    volume = "32",
    pages = "986--992",
    journal = "Journal of Sports Science",
    issn = "0264-0414",
    publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
    number = "10",

    }

    Rankings in professional men's tennis: a rich but underutilized source of information. / Reid, Machar; Morgan, S.W.; Churchill, T.; Bane, M.K.

    In: Journal of Sports Sciences, Vol. 32, No. 10, 2014, p. 986-992.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Rankings in professional men's tennis: a rich but underutilized source of information

    AU - Reid, Machar

    AU - Morgan, S.W.

    AU - Churchill, T.

    AU - Bane, M.K.

    PY - 2014

    Y1 - 2014

    N2 - Success in professional tennis is measured, at least in part, by rankings. However, there is little quantitative evidence to inform stakeholders regarding what represents the typical ranking progress of top-ranked players. The objective of this study was therefore to compare the ranking trajectories of male players whom achieved peak professional rankings in the Top 250, 175, 100, 50, 20 and 10. The 11,396 birthdates and weekly professional rankings of all players between 27 August 1973 and 31 October 2011 were collated. The peak ranks for each athlete according to their both chronological age and number of years on tour were identified and athletes were categorised into one of six career-peak ranking bands. One-way analysis of variance tests confirmed distinctive ranking trajectories, which were most pronounced among Top 10 players. The rankings of these players were statistically distinguishable following players' second year on tour or by 17 years of age. The ranking signature of all Top 100 players emerged as significantly different to players that failed to enter the Top 100 by their fourth year on the tour. Indeed, the representation of ranking as a function of years on tour should be considered for use by tennis policy-makers in the future. © 2014 Crown Copyright.

    AB - Success in professional tennis is measured, at least in part, by rankings. However, there is little quantitative evidence to inform stakeholders regarding what represents the typical ranking progress of top-ranked players. The objective of this study was therefore to compare the ranking trajectories of male players whom achieved peak professional rankings in the Top 250, 175, 100, 50, 20 and 10. The 11,396 birthdates and weekly professional rankings of all players between 27 August 1973 and 31 October 2011 were collated. The peak ranks for each athlete according to their both chronological age and number of years on tour were identified and athletes were categorised into one of six career-peak ranking bands. One-way analysis of variance tests confirmed distinctive ranking trajectories, which were most pronounced among Top 10 players. The rankings of these players were statistically distinguishable following players' second year on tour or by 17 years of age. The ranking signature of all Top 100 players emerged as significantly different to players that failed to enter the Top 100 by their fourth year on the tour. Indeed, the representation of ranking as a function of years on tour should be considered for use by tennis policy-makers in the future. © 2014 Crown Copyright.

    U2 - 10.1080/02640414.2013.876086

    DO - 10.1080/02640414.2013.876086

    M3 - Article

    VL - 32

    SP - 986

    EP - 992

    JO - Journal of Sports Science

    JF - Journal of Sports Science

    SN - 0264-0414

    IS - 10

    ER -