Randomized controlled psychotherapy trials in eating disorders: Improving their conduct, interpretation and usefulness

Tracey D. Wade, Catherine Johnson, Susan M. Byrne

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: While randomized controlled trials (RCTs) inform the efficacy and effectiveness of treatments, we need to understand that even RCTs can be associated with sub-optimal execution. This is of special pertinence to eating disorders given the majority of treatment studies involving cognitive behaviour therapy are of poor quality with respect to managing risk of bias adequately. Methods: The current paper outlines the components of a good RCT for psychotherapy, and examines ways to improve the conduct, interpretation, and usefulness of RCTs. Results: This includes managing reporting bias, recognizing the limits of randomization, applicability, and ethical considerations. Conclusions: We highlight a number of strategies for future research, including issues related to utilizing a variety of designs to examine treatment outcomes, integrity, openness and reproducibility.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)629-636
Number of pages8
JournalInternational Journal of Eating Disorders
Volume51
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2018

Fingerprint

Psychotherapy
Randomized Controlled Trials
Cognitive Therapy
Random Allocation
Feeding and Eating Disorders

Cite this

@article{4df57aa12a74422a8006f3f5986232c1,
title = "Randomized controlled psychotherapy trials in eating disorders: Improving their conduct, interpretation and usefulness",
abstract = "Background: While randomized controlled trials (RCTs) inform the efficacy and effectiveness of treatments, we need to understand that even RCTs can be associated with sub-optimal execution. This is of special pertinence to eating disorders given the majority of treatment studies involving cognitive behaviour therapy are of poor quality with respect to managing risk of bias adequately. Methods: The current paper outlines the components of a good RCT for psychotherapy, and examines ways to improve the conduct, interpretation, and usefulness of RCTs. Results: This includes managing reporting bias, recognizing the limits of randomization, applicability, and ethical considerations. Conclusions: We highlight a number of strategies for future research, including issues related to utilizing a variety of designs to examine treatment outcomes, integrity, openness and reproducibility.",
keywords = "disadvantages, external validity, randomized controlled trials, reproducibility",
author = "Wade, {Tracey D.} and Catherine Johnson and Byrne, {Susan M.}",
year = "2018",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/eat.22872",
language = "English",
volume = "51",
pages = "629--636",
journal = "International Journal of Eating Disorders",
issn = "0276-3478",
publisher = "John Wiley & Sons",
number = "7",

}

Randomized controlled psychotherapy trials in eating disorders : Improving their conduct, interpretation and usefulness. / Wade, Tracey D.; Johnson, Catherine; Byrne, Susan M.

In: International Journal of Eating Disorders, Vol. 51, No. 7, 01.07.2018, p. 629-636.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Randomized controlled psychotherapy trials in eating disorders

T2 - Improving their conduct, interpretation and usefulness

AU - Wade, Tracey D.

AU - Johnson, Catherine

AU - Byrne, Susan M.

PY - 2018/7/1

Y1 - 2018/7/1

N2 - Background: While randomized controlled trials (RCTs) inform the efficacy and effectiveness of treatments, we need to understand that even RCTs can be associated with sub-optimal execution. This is of special pertinence to eating disorders given the majority of treatment studies involving cognitive behaviour therapy are of poor quality with respect to managing risk of bias adequately. Methods: The current paper outlines the components of a good RCT for psychotherapy, and examines ways to improve the conduct, interpretation, and usefulness of RCTs. Results: This includes managing reporting bias, recognizing the limits of randomization, applicability, and ethical considerations. Conclusions: We highlight a number of strategies for future research, including issues related to utilizing a variety of designs to examine treatment outcomes, integrity, openness and reproducibility.

AB - Background: While randomized controlled trials (RCTs) inform the efficacy and effectiveness of treatments, we need to understand that even RCTs can be associated with sub-optimal execution. This is of special pertinence to eating disorders given the majority of treatment studies involving cognitive behaviour therapy are of poor quality with respect to managing risk of bias adequately. Methods: The current paper outlines the components of a good RCT for psychotherapy, and examines ways to improve the conduct, interpretation, and usefulness of RCTs. Results: This includes managing reporting bias, recognizing the limits of randomization, applicability, and ethical considerations. Conclusions: We highlight a number of strategies for future research, including issues related to utilizing a variety of designs to examine treatment outcomes, integrity, openness and reproducibility.

KW - disadvantages

KW - external validity

KW - randomized controlled trials

KW - reproducibility

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85046341979&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/eat.22872

DO - 10.1002/eat.22872

M3 - Article

VL - 51

SP - 629

EP - 636

JO - International Journal of Eating Disorders

JF - International Journal of Eating Disorders

SN - 0276-3478

IS - 7

ER -