Radical and deist writing

Nicholas McDowell, Giovanni Tarantino

Research output: Chapter in Book/Conference paperChapterpeer-review

Abstract

The fundamental epistemological distinction between enthusiastic and rational radicalism, which issues in important distinctions of expression and style, as well as thought, in radical prose, tends to become blurred in attempts to map a continuous tradition of free-thinking and libertinism in Britain and Ireland, stretching from the English Revolution to the eighteenth century. Whereas the self-proclaimed prophets proclaimed the irrelevance of humanist intellectual tradition to the experience of the internal Spirit or 'inner light', the deists and free-thinkers made their bookishness and access to the classical tradition a key element of their appeal to a superior rationality. Where there is some ideological overlap between the traditions is in a shared and vigorous anticlericalism; but there is also, as this chapter shows, a stylistic continuity in the use of irony, satire, and parody by university-educated radicals of the mid-century.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationThe Oxford Handbook of English Prose, 1640-1714
PublisherOxford University Press, USA
Chapter30
Pages520-536
Number of pages17
ISBN (Electronic)9780198940470
ISBN (Print)9780198746843
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 23 Jan 2025

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Radical and deist writing'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this