Race coding and the other-race effect in face recognition

Gillian Rhodes, Vance Locke, L.A. Ewing, E.L. Evangelista

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

57 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Other-race faces are generally recognised more poorly than own-race faces. According to Levin’s influential race-coding hypothesis, this other-race recognition deficit results from spontaneous coding of race-specifying information, at the expense of individuating information, in other-race faces. Therefore, requiring participants to code race-specifying information for all faces should eliminate the other-race effect by reducing recognition of own-race faces to the level of other-race faces. We tested this prediction in two experiments. Race coding was induced by requiring participants to rate study faces on race typicality (experiment 1) or to categorise them by race (experiment 2). Neither manipulation reduced the other-race effect, providing no support for the race-coding hypothesis. Instead, race-coding instructions marginally increased the other-race effect in experiment 1 and had no effect in experiment 2. These results do not support the race-coding hypothesis. Surprisingly, a control task of rating the attractiveness of study faces increased the other-race effect, indicating that deeper encoding of faces does not necessarily reduce the effect (experiment 1). Finally, the normally robust other-race effect was absent when participants were instructed to individuate other-race faces (experiment 2). We suggest that poorer recognition of other-race faces may reflect reduced perceptual expertise with such faces and perhaps reduced motivation to individuate them.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)232-241
JournalPerception
Volume38
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2009

Fingerprint

Face recognition
Experiments
Facial Recognition

Cite this

Rhodes, Gillian ; Locke, Vance ; Ewing, L.A. ; Evangelista, E.L. / Race coding and the other-race effect in face recognition. In: Perception. 2009 ; Vol. 38, No. 2. pp. 232-241.
@article{7544c07b0722406a99afe0dbce8770aa,
title = "Race coding and the other-race effect in face recognition",
abstract = "Other-race faces are generally recognised more poorly than own-race faces. According to Levin’s influential race-coding hypothesis, this other-race recognition deficit results from spontaneous coding of race-specifying information, at the expense of individuating information, in other-race faces. Therefore, requiring participants to code race-specifying information for all faces should eliminate the other-race effect by reducing recognition of own-race faces to the level of other-race faces. We tested this prediction in two experiments. Race coding was induced by requiring participants to rate study faces on race typicality (experiment 1) or to categorise them by race (experiment 2). Neither manipulation reduced the other-race effect, providing no support for the race-coding hypothesis. Instead, race-coding instructions marginally increased the other-race effect in experiment 1 and had no effect in experiment 2. These results do not support the race-coding hypothesis. Surprisingly, a control task of rating the attractiveness of study faces increased the other-race effect, indicating that deeper encoding of faces does not necessarily reduce the effect (experiment 1). Finally, the normally robust other-race effect was absent when participants were instructed to individuate other-race faces (experiment 2). We suggest that poorer recognition of other-race faces may reflect reduced perceptual expertise with such faces and perhaps reduced motivation to individuate them.",
author = "Gillian Rhodes and Vance Locke and L.A. Ewing and E.L. Evangelista",
year = "2009",
doi = "10.1068/p6110",
language = "English",
volume = "38",
pages = "232--241",
journal = "Perception",
issn = "0301-0066",
publisher = "Pion Ltd",
number = "2",

}

Race coding and the other-race effect in face recognition. / Rhodes, Gillian; Locke, Vance; Ewing, L.A.; Evangelista, E.L.

In: Perception, Vol. 38, No. 2, 2009, p. 232-241.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Race coding and the other-race effect in face recognition

AU - Rhodes, Gillian

AU - Locke, Vance

AU - Ewing, L.A.

AU - Evangelista, E.L.

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - Other-race faces are generally recognised more poorly than own-race faces. According to Levin’s influential race-coding hypothesis, this other-race recognition deficit results from spontaneous coding of race-specifying information, at the expense of individuating information, in other-race faces. Therefore, requiring participants to code race-specifying information for all faces should eliminate the other-race effect by reducing recognition of own-race faces to the level of other-race faces. We tested this prediction in two experiments. Race coding was induced by requiring participants to rate study faces on race typicality (experiment 1) or to categorise them by race (experiment 2). Neither manipulation reduced the other-race effect, providing no support for the race-coding hypothesis. Instead, race-coding instructions marginally increased the other-race effect in experiment 1 and had no effect in experiment 2. These results do not support the race-coding hypothesis. Surprisingly, a control task of rating the attractiveness of study faces increased the other-race effect, indicating that deeper encoding of faces does not necessarily reduce the effect (experiment 1). Finally, the normally robust other-race effect was absent when participants were instructed to individuate other-race faces (experiment 2). We suggest that poorer recognition of other-race faces may reflect reduced perceptual expertise with such faces and perhaps reduced motivation to individuate them.

AB - Other-race faces are generally recognised more poorly than own-race faces. According to Levin’s influential race-coding hypothesis, this other-race recognition deficit results from spontaneous coding of race-specifying information, at the expense of individuating information, in other-race faces. Therefore, requiring participants to code race-specifying information for all faces should eliminate the other-race effect by reducing recognition of own-race faces to the level of other-race faces. We tested this prediction in two experiments. Race coding was induced by requiring participants to rate study faces on race typicality (experiment 1) or to categorise them by race (experiment 2). Neither manipulation reduced the other-race effect, providing no support for the race-coding hypothesis. Instead, race-coding instructions marginally increased the other-race effect in experiment 1 and had no effect in experiment 2. These results do not support the race-coding hypothesis. Surprisingly, a control task of rating the attractiveness of study faces increased the other-race effect, indicating that deeper encoding of faces does not necessarily reduce the effect (experiment 1). Finally, the normally robust other-race effect was absent when participants were instructed to individuate other-race faces (experiment 2). We suggest that poorer recognition of other-race faces may reflect reduced perceptual expertise with such faces and perhaps reduced motivation to individuate them.

U2 - 10.1068/p6110

DO - 10.1068/p6110

M3 - Article

VL - 38

SP - 232

EP - 241

JO - Perception

JF - Perception

SN - 0301-0066

IS - 2

ER -