Quantifying the psychological value of goal achievement

Timothy Ballard, Simon Farrell, Andrew Neal

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

It is often assumed that people put forth the least amount of effort necessary to obtain a reward. This assumption is consistent with so-called “rational” economic models of behavior. Yet these models rarely take into account the motivating effects of goals, which may lead to departures from objective reward maximizing behavior. We present an experiment in which people make a series of prioritization decisions whilst pursuing two approach or avoidance goals. Participants were rewarded $10 if they achieved both goals on a randomly selected trial, and either $0, $2.50, $5, $7.50, or $10 if they achieved only one. Bayesian parameter estimation was used to examine the subjective values that people placed on various goal achievement outcomes. The results suggested that people often discounted the achievement of the first goal, relative to a reward maximizing model, particularly when pursuing avoidance goals. These results were most evident among participants who could obtain the full reward after achieving just one goal, yet behaved as if achieving one goal was only half as valuable as achieving both. Our findings question the notion that people put forth the least amount of effort required to obtain a reward. They suggest that when tasks have explicit goals, people may even sacrifice financial reward to achieve the goals.

LanguageEnglish
Pages1184-1192
Number of pages9
JournalPsychonomic Bulletin and Review
Volume25
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jun 2018

Fingerprint

Psychology
Reward
Psychological
Achievement Goals
Economic Models
Avoidance

Cite this

Ballard, Timothy ; Farrell, Simon ; Neal, Andrew. / Quantifying the psychological value of goal achievement. In: Psychonomic Bulletin and Review. 2018 ; Vol. 25, No. 3. pp. 1184-1192
@article{06d0745a8fbd47d68f552c24a1d6e872,
title = "Quantifying the psychological value of goal achievement",
abstract = "It is often assumed that people put forth the least amount of effort necessary to obtain a reward. This assumption is consistent with so-called “rational” economic models of behavior. Yet these models rarely take into account the motivating effects of goals, which may lead to departures from objective reward maximizing behavior. We present an experiment in which people make a series of prioritization decisions whilst pursuing two approach or avoidance goals. Participants were rewarded $10 if they achieved both goals on a randomly selected trial, and either $0, $2.50, $5, $7.50, or $10 if they achieved only one. Bayesian parameter estimation was used to examine the subjective values that people placed on various goal achievement outcomes. The results suggested that people often discounted the achievement of the first goal, relative to a reward maximizing model, particularly when pursuing avoidance goals. These results were most evident among participants who could obtain the full reward after achieving just one goal, yet behaved as if achieving one goal was only half as valuable as achieving both. Our findings question the notion that people put forth the least amount of effort required to obtain a reward. They suggest that when tasks have explicit goals, people may even sacrifice financial reward to achieve the goals.",
keywords = "Bayesian modeling, Decision-making, Goals, Reward",
author = "Timothy Ballard and Simon Farrell and Andrew Neal",
year = "2018",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3758/s13423-017-1329-1",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "1184--1192",
journal = "Psychonomic Bulletin & Review",
issn = "1069-9384",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "3",

}

Quantifying the psychological value of goal achievement. / Ballard, Timothy; Farrell, Simon; Neal, Andrew.

In: Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, Vol. 25, No. 3, 01.06.2018, p. 1184-1192.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Quantifying the psychological value of goal achievement

AU - Ballard,Timothy

AU - Farrell,Simon

AU - Neal,Andrew

PY - 2018/6/1

Y1 - 2018/6/1

N2 - It is often assumed that people put forth the least amount of effort necessary to obtain a reward. This assumption is consistent with so-called “rational” economic models of behavior. Yet these models rarely take into account the motivating effects of goals, which may lead to departures from objective reward maximizing behavior. We present an experiment in which people make a series of prioritization decisions whilst pursuing two approach or avoidance goals. Participants were rewarded $10 if they achieved both goals on a randomly selected trial, and either $0, $2.50, $5, $7.50, or $10 if they achieved only one. Bayesian parameter estimation was used to examine the subjective values that people placed on various goal achievement outcomes. The results suggested that people often discounted the achievement of the first goal, relative to a reward maximizing model, particularly when pursuing avoidance goals. These results were most evident among participants who could obtain the full reward after achieving just one goal, yet behaved as if achieving one goal was only half as valuable as achieving both. Our findings question the notion that people put forth the least amount of effort required to obtain a reward. They suggest that when tasks have explicit goals, people may even sacrifice financial reward to achieve the goals.

AB - It is often assumed that people put forth the least amount of effort necessary to obtain a reward. This assumption is consistent with so-called “rational” economic models of behavior. Yet these models rarely take into account the motivating effects of goals, which may lead to departures from objective reward maximizing behavior. We present an experiment in which people make a series of prioritization decisions whilst pursuing two approach or avoidance goals. Participants were rewarded $10 if they achieved both goals on a randomly selected trial, and either $0, $2.50, $5, $7.50, or $10 if they achieved only one. Bayesian parameter estimation was used to examine the subjective values that people placed on various goal achievement outcomes. The results suggested that people often discounted the achievement of the first goal, relative to a reward maximizing model, particularly when pursuing avoidance goals. These results were most evident among participants who could obtain the full reward after achieving just one goal, yet behaved as if achieving one goal was only half as valuable as achieving both. Our findings question the notion that people put forth the least amount of effort required to obtain a reward. They suggest that when tasks have explicit goals, people may even sacrifice financial reward to achieve the goals.

KW - Bayesian modeling

KW - Decision-making

KW - Goals

KW - Reward

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85022016340&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3758/s13423-017-1329-1

DO - 10.3758/s13423-017-1329-1

M3 - Article

VL - 25

SP - 1184

EP - 1192

JO - Psychonomic Bulletin & Review

T2 - Psychonomic Bulletin & Review

JF - Psychonomic Bulletin & Review

SN - 1069-9384

IS - 3

ER -