Quality of public open spaces and recreational walking

T. Sugiyama, L.D. Gunn, Hayley Christian, Jacinta Francis, Sarah Foster, Paula Hooper, N. Owen, B. Giles-Corti

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives. We examined associations between specific public open space (POS) attributes and recreational walking to local POS. Methods. Between October 2004 and December 2006, 1465 adults of the RESIDential Environments Project, conducted in Perth, Australia, reported whether they walk to a POS for recreation. For each participant, we identified all open spaces larger than 0.8 hectares within 1.6 kilometers from home. On the basis of field audit data, we created 3 scores (presence, count, size-weighted presence) for 19 specific open space attributes. Results. With logistic regression analyses, we found that walking to a POS was associated with the presence of gardens, grassed areas, walking paths, water features, wildlife, amenities, dog-related facilities, and off-leash areas for dogs. It was also associated with the highest number of these attributes in a single open space, but not with the total number of attributes in all POSs within 1.6 kilometers of home. Conclusions. Building 1 high-quality local park may be more effective in promoting recreational walking than is providing many average-quality parks.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2490-2495
JournalAmerican Journal of Public Health
Volume105
Issue number12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2015

Fingerprint

Walking
Dogs
Recreation
Logistic Models
Regression Analysis
Water

Cite this

@article{51fd0eb322fc428295f6cb50038d17fa,
title = "Quality of public open spaces and recreational walking",
abstract = "Objectives. We examined associations between specific public open space (POS) attributes and recreational walking to local POS. Methods. Between October 2004 and December 2006, 1465 adults of the RESIDential Environments Project, conducted in Perth, Australia, reported whether they walk to a POS for recreation. For each participant, we identified all open spaces larger than 0.8 hectares within 1.6 kilometers from home. On the basis of field audit data, we created 3 scores (presence, count, size-weighted presence) for 19 specific open space attributes. Results. With logistic regression analyses, we found that walking to a POS was associated with the presence of gardens, grassed areas, walking paths, water features, wildlife, amenities, dog-related facilities, and off-leash areas for dogs. It was also associated with the highest number of these attributes in a single open space, but not with the total number of attributes in all POSs within 1.6 kilometers of home. Conclusions. Building 1 high-quality local park may be more effective in promoting recreational walking than is providing many average-quality parks.",
author = "T. Sugiyama and L.D. Gunn and Hayley Christian and Jacinta Francis and Sarah Foster and Paula Hooper and N. Owen and B. Giles-Corti",
year = "2015",
month = "12",
doi = "10.2105/AJPH.2015.302890",
language = "English",
volume = "105",
pages = "2490--2495",
journal = "American Journal of Public Health",
issn = "0090-0036",
publisher = "American Public Health Association",
number = "12",

}

Quality of public open spaces and recreational walking. / Sugiyama, T.; Gunn, L.D.; Christian, Hayley; Francis, Jacinta; Foster, Sarah; Hooper, Paula; Owen, N.; Giles-Corti, B.

In: American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 105, No. 12, 12.2015, p. 2490-2495.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Quality of public open spaces and recreational walking

AU - Sugiyama, T.

AU - Gunn, L.D.

AU - Christian, Hayley

AU - Francis, Jacinta

AU - Foster, Sarah

AU - Hooper, Paula

AU - Owen, N.

AU - Giles-Corti, B.

PY - 2015/12

Y1 - 2015/12

N2 - Objectives. We examined associations between specific public open space (POS) attributes and recreational walking to local POS. Methods. Between October 2004 and December 2006, 1465 adults of the RESIDential Environments Project, conducted in Perth, Australia, reported whether they walk to a POS for recreation. For each participant, we identified all open spaces larger than 0.8 hectares within 1.6 kilometers from home. On the basis of field audit data, we created 3 scores (presence, count, size-weighted presence) for 19 specific open space attributes. Results. With logistic regression analyses, we found that walking to a POS was associated with the presence of gardens, grassed areas, walking paths, water features, wildlife, amenities, dog-related facilities, and off-leash areas for dogs. It was also associated with the highest number of these attributes in a single open space, but not with the total number of attributes in all POSs within 1.6 kilometers of home. Conclusions. Building 1 high-quality local park may be more effective in promoting recreational walking than is providing many average-quality parks.

AB - Objectives. We examined associations between specific public open space (POS) attributes and recreational walking to local POS. Methods. Between October 2004 and December 2006, 1465 adults of the RESIDential Environments Project, conducted in Perth, Australia, reported whether they walk to a POS for recreation. For each participant, we identified all open spaces larger than 0.8 hectares within 1.6 kilometers from home. On the basis of field audit data, we created 3 scores (presence, count, size-weighted presence) for 19 specific open space attributes. Results. With logistic regression analyses, we found that walking to a POS was associated with the presence of gardens, grassed areas, walking paths, water features, wildlife, amenities, dog-related facilities, and off-leash areas for dogs. It was also associated with the highest number of these attributes in a single open space, but not with the total number of attributes in all POSs within 1.6 kilometers of home. Conclusions. Building 1 high-quality local park may be more effective in promoting recreational walking than is providing many average-quality parks.

U2 - 10.2105/AJPH.2015.302890

DO - 10.2105/AJPH.2015.302890

M3 - Article

VL - 105

SP - 2490

EP - 2495

JO - American Journal of Public Health

JF - American Journal of Public Health

SN - 0090-0036

IS - 12

ER -