Qualitative analysis of parental observations on quality of life in Australian children with Down syndrome

Nada Murphy, Amy Epstein, Helen Leonard, Elise Davis, Dinah Reddihough, Andrew Whitehouse, Peter Jacoby, Jenny Bourke, Katrina Williams, Jennepher Downs

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: There are many challenges to health, functioning, and participation for children with Down syndrome; yet, the quality-of-life (QOL) domains important for this group have never been clearly articulated. This study investigated parental observations to identify QOL domains in children with Down syndrome and determined whether domains differed between children and adolescents. Methods: The sample comprised 17 families whose child with Down syndrome was aged 6 to 18 years. Primary caregivers took part in semistructured telephone interviews to explore aspects of their child's life that were satisfying or challenging. Qualitative thematic analysis was implemented using a grounded theory framework to identify domains. The coded data set was divided into 2 groups (childhood and adolescence) at 3 age cut points to observe whether differences existed between the coded domains and domain elements: (1) 6 to 11 years with 12 to 18 years; (2) 6 to 13 years with 14 to 18 years; and (3) 6 to 15 years with 16 to 18 years. Results: Eleven domains were identified: physical health, behavior and emotion, personal value, communication, movement and physical activity, routines and predictability, independence and autonomy, social connectedness and relationships, variety of activities, nature and outdoors, and access to services. No differences in domains and domain elements were identified across childhood and adolescence. Conclusion: Our data form a preliminary framework from which to design investigations of the child's perspectives on life quality and suggest a range of necessary supports and services.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)161-168
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics
Volume38
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2017

Fingerprint

Down Syndrome
Quality of Life
Health
Caregivers
Emotions
Communication
Interviews
Exercise

Cite this

Murphy, Nada ; Epstein, Amy ; Leonard, Helen ; Davis, Elise ; Reddihough, Dinah ; Whitehouse, Andrew ; Jacoby, Peter ; Bourke, Jenny ; Williams, Katrina ; Downs, Jennepher. / Qualitative analysis of parental observations on quality of life in Australian children with Down syndrome. In: Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics. 2017 ; Vol. 38, No. 2. pp. 161-168.
@article{a7ad4137fcea454e9240846eb08eedbc,
title = "Qualitative analysis of parental observations on quality of life in Australian children with Down syndrome",
abstract = "Objective: There are many challenges to health, functioning, and participation for children with Down syndrome; yet, the quality-of-life (QOL) domains important for this group have never been clearly articulated. This study investigated parental observations to identify QOL domains in children with Down syndrome and determined whether domains differed between children and adolescents. Methods: The sample comprised 17 families whose child with Down syndrome was aged 6 to 18 years. Primary caregivers took part in semistructured telephone interviews to explore aspects of their child's life that were satisfying or challenging. Qualitative thematic analysis was implemented using a grounded theory framework to identify domains. The coded data set was divided into 2 groups (childhood and adolescence) at 3 age cut points to observe whether differences existed between the coded domains and domain elements: (1) 6 to 11 years with 12 to 18 years; (2) 6 to 13 years with 14 to 18 years; and (3) 6 to 15 years with 16 to 18 years. Results: Eleven domains were identified: physical health, behavior and emotion, personal value, communication, movement and physical activity, routines and predictability, independence and autonomy, social connectedness and relationships, variety of activities, nature and outdoors, and access to services. No differences in domains and domain elements were identified across childhood and adolescence. Conclusion: Our data form a preliminary framework from which to design investigations of the child's perspectives on life quality and suggest a range of necessary supports and services.",
author = "Nada Murphy and Amy Epstein and Helen Leonard and Elise Davis and Dinah Reddihough and Andrew Whitehouse and Peter Jacoby and Jenny Bourke and Katrina Williams and Jennepher Downs",
year = "2017",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1097/DBP.0000000000000385",
language = "English",
volume = "38",
pages = "161--168",
journal = "Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics",
issn = "0196-206X",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams & Wilkins",
number = "2",

}

Qualitative analysis of parental observations on quality of life in Australian children with Down syndrome. / Murphy, Nada; Epstein, Amy; Leonard, Helen; Davis, Elise; Reddihough, Dinah; Whitehouse, Andrew; Jacoby, Peter; Bourke, Jenny; Williams, Katrina; Downs, Jennepher.

In: Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, Vol. 38, No. 2, 02.2017, p. 161-168.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Qualitative analysis of parental observations on quality of life in Australian children with Down syndrome

AU - Murphy, Nada

AU - Epstein, Amy

AU - Leonard, Helen

AU - Davis, Elise

AU - Reddihough, Dinah

AU - Whitehouse, Andrew

AU - Jacoby, Peter

AU - Bourke, Jenny

AU - Williams, Katrina

AU - Downs, Jennepher

PY - 2017/2

Y1 - 2017/2

N2 - Objective: There are many challenges to health, functioning, and participation for children with Down syndrome; yet, the quality-of-life (QOL) domains important for this group have never been clearly articulated. This study investigated parental observations to identify QOL domains in children with Down syndrome and determined whether domains differed between children and adolescents. Methods: The sample comprised 17 families whose child with Down syndrome was aged 6 to 18 years. Primary caregivers took part in semistructured telephone interviews to explore aspects of their child's life that were satisfying or challenging. Qualitative thematic analysis was implemented using a grounded theory framework to identify domains. The coded data set was divided into 2 groups (childhood and adolescence) at 3 age cut points to observe whether differences existed between the coded domains and domain elements: (1) 6 to 11 years with 12 to 18 years; (2) 6 to 13 years with 14 to 18 years; and (3) 6 to 15 years with 16 to 18 years. Results: Eleven domains were identified: physical health, behavior and emotion, personal value, communication, movement and physical activity, routines and predictability, independence and autonomy, social connectedness and relationships, variety of activities, nature and outdoors, and access to services. No differences in domains and domain elements were identified across childhood and adolescence. Conclusion: Our data form a preliminary framework from which to design investigations of the child's perspectives on life quality and suggest a range of necessary supports and services.

AB - Objective: There are many challenges to health, functioning, and participation for children with Down syndrome; yet, the quality-of-life (QOL) domains important for this group have never been clearly articulated. This study investigated parental observations to identify QOL domains in children with Down syndrome and determined whether domains differed between children and adolescents. Methods: The sample comprised 17 families whose child with Down syndrome was aged 6 to 18 years. Primary caregivers took part in semistructured telephone interviews to explore aspects of their child's life that were satisfying or challenging. Qualitative thematic analysis was implemented using a grounded theory framework to identify domains. The coded data set was divided into 2 groups (childhood and adolescence) at 3 age cut points to observe whether differences existed between the coded domains and domain elements: (1) 6 to 11 years with 12 to 18 years; (2) 6 to 13 years with 14 to 18 years; and (3) 6 to 15 years with 16 to 18 years. Results: Eleven domains were identified: physical health, behavior and emotion, personal value, communication, movement and physical activity, routines and predictability, independence and autonomy, social connectedness and relationships, variety of activities, nature and outdoors, and access to services. No differences in domains and domain elements were identified across childhood and adolescence. Conclusion: Our data form a preliminary framework from which to design investigations of the child's perspectives on life quality and suggest a range of necessary supports and services.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85009820384&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/DBP.0000000000000385

DO - 10.1097/DBP.0000000000000385

M3 - Article

VL - 38

SP - 161

EP - 168

JO - Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics

JF - Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics

SN - 0196-206X

IS - 2

ER -