Pyrosequencing faecal DNA to determine diet of little penguins: Is what goes in what comes out?

Bruce E. Deagle, André Chiaradia, Julie McInnes, Simon N. Jarman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

213 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

DNA barcoding of faeces or stomach contents is an emerging approach for dietary analysis. We pyrosequenced mtDNA 16S markers amplified from faeces of captive little penguins (Eudyptula minor) to examine if recovered sequences reflect the proportions of species consumed. We also analysed wild little penguin faeces collected from 100 nests in southeast Australia. In the captive study, pilchards were the primary fish fed to the penguins and DNA sequences from pilchard were the most common sequences recovered. Sequences of three other fish fed in constant mass proportions (45:35:20) were all detected, but proportions of sequences (60:6:34) were considerably different than mass proportions in the diet. Correction factors based on relative mtDNA density in the fish did not improve diet estimates. Consistency between replicate samples suggests that the observed bias resulted from differences in prey digestibility. Detection of DNA from fish consumed before the penguins were brought into captivity indicates that a DNA signal in faeces can persist for at least 4 days after ingestion. In the wild-collected faeces, 24 distinct fish and 1 squid were identified; anchovy, barracouta and pilchard accounted for over 80% of these sequences. Our results highlight that DNA sequences recovered in dietary barcoding studies can provide semi-quantitative information on diet composition, but these data should be given wide confidence intervals.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2039-2048
Number of pages10
JournalConservation Genetics
Volume11
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 17 Jun 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Pyrosequencing faecal DNA to determine diet of little penguins: Is what goes in what comes out?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this