TY - JOUR
T1 - Psychological interventions for reducing anxiety in patients undergoing first-Time colonoscopy
T2 - A pilot and feasibility study
AU - Albashir, Siwar
AU - Durepos, Pamela
AU - Causada Calo, Natalia
AU - Mangat, Ramandeep
AU - Nowakowski, Matilda
AU - Kaasalainen, Sharon
AU - Anglin, Rebecca
AU - Moayyedi, Paul
AU - Armstrong, David
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. All rights reserved.
PY - 2021/12
Y1 - 2021/12
N2 - Objectives To assess the feasibility of a randomized controlled trial (RCT), evaluating the efficacy and patients' perceptions of a psychological intervention aimed at reducing anxiety levels in adults undergoing first-Time colonoscopy. Methods Adults undergoing first-Time colonoscopy were randomized to a psychological intervention vs. sham intervention. The primary outcome was feasibility, defined as a recruitment rate of >50%. Patients' state anxiety was assessed before and after the intervention using the state-Trait inventory for cognitive and somatic anxiety (STICSA) score. Follow-up interviews were performed within 1 week with a sample of patients and focus groups with clinical staff. Results A total of 130 patients were recruited from 180 eligible patients (72%). Eighty were randomized and completed the study (n = 39) in the psychological intervention group and (n = 41) in the sham. In the psychological intervention group, pre-and postmedian STICSA scores were 29 and 24 (P < 0.001), respectively. In the sham group, pre-and postmedian scores were 31 and 25 (P < 0.001), respectively. Follow-up interviews with patients (n = 13) suggested that 100% of patients perceived the psychological intervention as beneficial and would recommend it to others. Conclusion The study was feasible. Patients in both groups improved their anxiety scores, but there were no significant differences between arms. Despite this, patients receiving psychological intervention perceived a benefit from the relaxation exercises.
AB - Objectives To assess the feasibility of a randomized controlled trial (RCT), evaluating the efficacy and patients' perceptions of a psychological intervention aimed at reducing anxiety levels in adults undergoing first-Time colonoscopy. Methods Adults undergoing first-Time colonoscopy were randomized to a psychological intervention vs. sham intervention. The primary outcome was feasibility, defined as a recruitment rate of >50%. Patients' state anxiety was assessed before and after the intervention using the state-Trait inventory for cognitive and somatic anxiety (STICSA) score. Follow-up interviews were performed within 1 week with a sample of patients and focus groups with clinical staff. Results A total of 130 patients were recruited from 180 eligible patients (72%). Eighty were randomized and completed the study (n = 39) in the psychological intervention group and (n = 41) in the sham. In the psychological intervention group, pre-and postmedian STICSA scores were 29 and 24 (P < 0.001), respectively. In the sham group, pre-and postmedian scores were 31 and 25 (P < 0.001), respectively. Follow-up interviews with patients (n = 13) suggested that 100% of patients perceived the psychological intervention as beneficial and would recommend it to others. Conclusion The study was feasible. Patients in both groups improved their anxiety scores, but there were no significant differences between arms. Despite this, patients receiving psychological intervention perceived a benefit from the relaxation exercises.
KW - anxiety
KW - colonoscopy
KW - feasibility studies
KW - randomized clinical trial
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85123808917&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/MEG.0000000000002186
DO - 10.1097/MEG.0000000000002186
M3 - Article
C2 - 34034274
AN - SCOPUS:85123808917
SN - 0954-691X
VL - 33
SP - E634-E641
JO - European Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology
JF - European Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology
IS - 1
ER -