Psychiatric injury : the new era

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1789 Downloads (Pure)


High Court decision in Tame v New South Wales; Annetts v Australian Stations Pty Ltd marks the beginning of a new era in the development of the law relating to psychiatric injury - High Court repudiated requirements of normal fortitude, direct perception and sudden shock and elevated the role of foreseeability - Report of the Commonwealth's Negligence Review Panel has recommended some new limitations which may inhibit the future development of the law.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)13-25
JournalThe tort Law Review
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 2003


Dive into the research topics of 'Psychiatric injury : the new era'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this