Prospective memory in the red zone: Cognitive control and capacity sharing in a complex, multi-stimulus task

Luke Strickland, David Elliott, Michael D Wilson, Shayne Loft, Andrew Neal, Andrew Heathcote

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)
28 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Remembering to perform a planned action upon encountering a future event requires event-based Prospective Memory (PM). PM is required in many human factors settings in which operators must process a great deal of complex, uncertain information from an interface. We study event-based PM in such an environment. Our task, which previous research has found is very demanding (Palada, Neal, Tay, & Heathcote, 2018), requires monitoring ships as they cross the ocean on a display. We applied the Prospective Memory Decision Control Model (Strickland, Loft, Remington, & Heathcote, 2018) to understand the cognitive mechanisms that underlie PM performance in such a demanding environment. We found evidence of capacity sharing between monitoring for PM items and performing the ongoing surveillance task, whereas studies of PM in simpler paradigms have not (e.g., Strickland et al., 2018). We also found that participants applied proactive and reactive control (Braver, 2012) to adapt to the demanding task environment. Our findings illustrate the value of human factors simulations to study capacity sharing between competing task processes. They also illustrate the value of cognitive models to illuminate the processes underlying adaptive behavior in complex environments. © 2019 American Psychological Association.
Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Experimental Psychology: Applied
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 15 Apr 2019

Fingerprint

Episodic Memory
Ships
Psychological Adaptation
Oceans and Seas
Research

Cite this

@article{2ad9e52ef59345ab9dc2b71cdc84fbdb,
title = "Prospective memory in the red zone: Cognitive control and capacity sharing in a complex, multi-stimulus task",
abstract = "Remembering to perform a planned action upon encountering a future event requires event-based Prospective Memory (PM). PM is required in many human factors settings in which operators must process a great deal of complex, uncertain information from an interface. We study event-based PM in such an environment. Our task, which previous research has found is very demanding (Palada, Neal, Tay, & Heathcote, 2018), requires monitoring ships as they cross the ocean on a display. We applied the Prospective Memory Decision Control Model (Strickland, Loft, Remington, & Heathcote, 2018) to understand the cognitive mechanisms that underlie PM performance in such a demanding environment. We found evidence of capacity sharing between monitoring for PM items and performing the ongoing surveillance task, whereas studies of PM in simpler paradigms have not (e.g., Strickland et al., 2018). We also found that participants applied proactive and reactive control (Braver, 2012) to adapt to the demanding task environment. Our findings illustrate the value of human factors simulations to study capacity sharing between competing task processes. They also illustrate the value of cognitive models to illuminate the processes underlying adaptive behavior in complex environments. {\circledC} 2019 American Psychological Association.",
author = "Luke Strickland and David Elliott and Wilson, {Michael D} and Shayne Loft and Andrew Neal and Andrew Heathcote",
year = "2019",
month = "4",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1037/xap0000224",
language = "English",
journal = "JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-APPLIED",
issn = "1076-898X",
publisher = "American Psychological Association",

}

Prospective memory in the red zone : Cognitive control and capacity sharing in a complex, multi-stimulus task. / Strickland, Luke; Elliott, David; Wilson, Michael D; Loft, Shayne; Neal, Andrew; Heathcote, Andrew.

In: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 15.04.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Prospective memory in the red zone

T2 - Cognitive control and capacity sharing in a complex, multi-stimulus task

AU - Strickland, Luke

AU - Elliott, David

AU - Wilson, Michael D

AU - Loft, Shayne

AU - Neal, Andrew

AU - Heathcote, Andrew

PY - 2019/4/15

Y1 - 2019/4/15

N2 - Remembering to perform a planned action upon encountering a future event requires event-based Prospective Memory (PM). PM is required in many human factors settings in which operators must process a great deal of complex, uncertain information from an interface. We study event-based PM in such an environment. Our task, which previous research has found is very demanding (Palada, Neal, Tay, & Heathcote, 2018), requires monitoring ships as they cross the ocean on a display. We applied the Prospective Memory Decision Control Model (Strickland, Loft, Remington, & Heathcote, 2018) to understand the cognitive mechanisms that underlie PM performance in such a demanding environment. We found evidence of capacity sharing between monitoring for PM items and performing the ongoing surveillance task, whereas studies of PM in simpler paradigms have not (e.g., Strickland et al., 2018). We also found that participants applied proactive and reactive control (Braver, 2012) to adapt to the demanding task environment. Our findings illustrate the value of human factors simulations to study capacity sharing between competing task processes. They also illustrate the value of cognitive models to illuminate the processes underlying adaptive behavior in complex environments. © 2019 American Psychological Association.

AB - Remembering to perform a planned action upon encountering a future event requires event-based Prospective Memory (PM). PM is required in many human factors settings in which operators must process a great deal of complex, uncertain information from an interface. We study event-based PM in such an environment. Our task, which previous research has found is very demanding (Palada, Neal, Tay, & Heathcote, 2018), requires monitoring ships as they cross the ocean on a display. We applied the Prospective Memory Decision Control Model (Strickland, Loft, Remington, & Heathcote, 2018) to understand the cognitive mechanisms that underlie PM performance in such a demanding environment. We found evidence of capacity sharing between monitoring for PM items and performing the ongoing surveillance task, whereas studies of PM in simpler paradigms have not (e.g., Strickland et al., 2018). We also found that participants applied proactive and reactive control (Braver, 2012) to adapt to the demanding task environment. Our findings illustrate the value of human factors simulations to study capacity sharing between competing task processes. They also illustrate the value of cognitive models to illuminate the processes underlying adaptive behavior in complex environments. © 2019 American Psychological Association.

U2 - 10.1037/xap0000224

DO - 10.1037/xap0000224

M3 - Article

JO - JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-APPLIED

JF - JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-APPLIED

SN - 1076-898X

ER -