TY - JOUR
T1 - Properties of Several Fly Ash Materials in Relation to Use as Soil Amendments
AU - Pathan, S.M.
AU - Aylmore, Graham
AU - Colmer, Tim
PY - 2003
Y1 - 2003
N2 - Fly ash samples from five power stations in Western Australia and Queensland, and two soils,used for horticulture in Western Australia, were evaluated for a series of physical and chemical properties. Soils were comprised primarily of coarse sand-sized particles, whereas most of the fly ashes were primarily fine sand- and silt-sized particles.. Hydraulic conductivities in the fly ashes were 105- to 248-fold slower than in the soils. The-water-holding capacities of fly ashes at "Held capacity" were three times higher than those of the soils. Extractable P in the fly ashes (except Tarong and Callide) were 20- to 88-fold higher than in the soils. The pH showed considerable variation among the different sources of fly ash, with samples from Muja being the most acidic (pH = 3.8; 1:5 in CaCl2-extract) and from Gladstone the most alkaline (pH = 9.9). The toxicity characteristic leaching procedure (TCLP) values indicate that the potential for release of trace elements from the fly ashes was well below regulatory levels. When applied at sufficient rates (e.g., to achieve 10% w/w in surface layers) to sandy soils, fly ash altered texture and increased watery holding capacity. Depending on the source of fly ash used, such amendments could also provide P and aid nutrient retention by increasing the phosphorus retention index (PRI) and/or cation exchange capacity (CEC). The considerable variability in physical and chemical properties among the fly ash samples evaluated in the present study supports the notion that field trials-are essential to the future development of strategies making use of any particular source of soil amendment fly ash.
AB - Fly ash samples from five power stations in Western Australia and Queensland, and two soils,used for horticulture in Western Australia, were evaluated for a series of physical and chemical properties. Soils were comprised primarily of coarse sand-sized particles, whereas most of the fly ashes were primarily fine sand- and silt-sized particles.. Hydraulic conductivities in the fly ashes were 105- to 248-fold slower than in the soils. The-water-holding capacities of fly ashes at "Held capacity" were three times higher than those of the soils. Extractable P in the fly ashes (except Tarong and Callide) were 20- to 88-fold higher than in the soils. The pH showed considerable variation among the different sources of fly ash, with samples from Muja being the most acidic (pH = 3.8; 1:5 in CaCl2-extract) and from Gladstone the most alkaline (pH = 9.9). The toxicity characteristic leaching procedure (TCLP) values indicate that the potential for release of trace elements from the fly ashes was well below regulatory levels. When applied at sufficient rates (e.g., to achieve 10% w/w in surface layers) to sandy soils, fly ash altered texture and increased watery holding capacity. Depending on the source of fly ash used, such amendments could also provide P and aid nutrient retention by increasing the phosphorus retention index (PRI) and/or cation exchange capacity (CEC). The considerable variability in physical and chemical properties among the fly ash samples evaluated in the present study supports the notion that field trials-are essential to the future development of strategies making use of any particular source of soil amendment fly ash.
U2 - 10.2134/jeq2003.0687
DO - 10.2134/jeq2003.0687
M3 - Article
VL - 32
SP - 687
EP - 693
JO - Journal of Environmental Quality
JF - Journal of Environmental Quality
SN - 0047-2425
IS - 2
ER -