PRO: confronting resistance to rule-based medicine is essential to improving outcomes

John D Blakey, Michael Brown, James Pinchin, Mark Barley, Sarah Sharples

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)


The past 20 years have seen two great changes in the practice of medicine: the widespread adoption of evidence-based medicine, and the increasing challenge of managing complex multimorbid patients. Both these developments have resulted in clinical rules and protocols becoming ever more abundant and increasingly critical to delivering safe and effective patient care. These evidence-based clinical rules perform at least as well as expert opinion, and the increasing volume and quality of available clinical data suggests their performance could continue to improve. This article considers why clinicians deviate from effective rules, highlighting key issues such as the persisting culture of heroism, institutional inertia, deference to authority and personal heuristics. We argue that better rules can be created, and that clinical improvements will follow if there is a 'common knowledge' of these rules. Furthermore, we argue that there is a ceiling to the effectiveness of any rule, even one as simple as ensuring hand hygiene, unless individuals are held accountable for transgressions.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)110-111
Number of pages2
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2015
Externally publishedYes


Dive into the research topics of 'PRO: confronting resistance to rule-based medicine is essential to improving outcomes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this