Prioritisation of conservation research and monitoring for Western Australian protected areas and threatened species

C.J. Simpson, M. Beger, J.G. Colman, Kim Friedman, A.K. Hill, A.J. Kendrick, K.A. Waples, S.D. Whiting, Shaun Wilson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

© The Government of Western Australia, 2015. Prioritisation of natural assets for monitoring and research activities facilitates equitable allocation of finite conservation resources. We present a framework that identifies broad monitoring and research priorities for conservation areas, such as marine parks, and threatened species. Criteria within the framework are used to assess: the value (V) of assets; anthropogenic pressures (P) that affect assets; and the current state of asset knowledge (K). A panel of experts score criteria and the relative importance of each asset is calculated for monitoring (V * P), fundamental research (V * K) and applied research (V * P * K). The framework allows prioritisation of assets in an initial evaluation that agrees with institutional mandates, and facilitates future assessment of the feasibility and cost of monitoring or research in the implementation phase. The utility of the framework is that it can be easily applied by conservation practitioners and can concurrently prioritise monitoring and research of species, habitats and communities in marine and terrestrial environments.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)227-237
JournalConservation Science Western Australia
Volume9
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Fingerprint

prioritization
protected area
monitoring
marine park
terrestrial environment
marine environment
habitat
cost

Cite this

Simpson, C.J. ; Beger, M. ; Colman, J.G. ; Friedman, Kim ; Hill, A.K. ; Kendrick, A.J. ; Waples, K.A. ; Whiting, S.D. ; Wilson, Shaun. / Prioritisation of conservation research and monitoring for Western Australian protected areas and threatened species. In: Conservation Science Western Australia. 2015 ; Vol. 9, No. 3. pp. 227-237.
@article{e3b5f692c3994fab88d095b3a8a40f54,
title = "Prioritisation of conservation research and monitoring for Western Australian protected areas and threatened species",
abstract = "{\circledC} The Government of Western Australia, 2015. Prioritisation of natural assets for monitoring and research activities facilitates equitable allocation of finite conservation resources. We present a framework that identifies broad monitoring and research priorities for conservation areas, such as marine parks, and threatened species. Criteria within the framework are used to assess: the value (V) of assets; anthropogenic pressures (P) that affect assets; and the current state of asset knowledge (K). A panel of experts score criteria and the relative importance of each asset is calculated for monitoring (V * P), fundamental research (V * K) and applied research (V * P * K). The framework allows prioritisation of assets in an initial evaluation that agrees with institutional mandates, and facilitates future assessment of the feasibility and cost of monitoring or research in the implementation phase. The utility of the framework is that it can be easily applied by conservation practitioners and can concurrently prioritise monitoring and research of species, habitats and communities in marine and terrestrial environments.",
author = "C.J. Simpson and M. Beger and J.G. Colman and Kim Friedman and A.K. Hill and A.J. Kendrick and K.A. Waples and S.D. Whiting and Shaun Wilson",
year = "2015",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
pages = "227--237",
journal = "CALMScience",
issn = "1320-145X",
publisher = "Science Division, Department of Environment and Conservation",
number = "3",

}

Simpson, CJ, Beger, M, Colman, JG, Friedman, K, Hill, AK, Kendrick, AJ, Waples, KA, Whiting, SD & Wilson, S 2015, 'Prioritisation of conservation research and monitoring for Western Australian protected areas and threatened species' Conservation Science Western Australia, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 227-237.

Prioritisation of conservation research and monitoring for Western Australian protected areas and threatened species. / Simpson, C.J.; Beger, M.; Colman, J.G.; Friedman, Kim; Hill, A.K.; Kendrick, A.J.; Waples, K.A.; Whiting, S.D.; Wilson, Shaun.

In: Conservation Science Western Australia, Vol. 9, No. 3, 2015, p. 227-237.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Prioritisation of conservation research and monitoring for Western Australian protected areas and threatened species

AU - Simpson, C.J.

AU - Beger, M.

AU - Colman, J.G.

AU - Friedman, Kim

AU - Hill, A.K.

AU - Kendrick, A.J.

AU - Waples, K.A.

AU - Whiting, S.D.

AU - Wilson, Shaun

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - © The Government of Western Australia, 2015. Prioritisation of natural assets for monitoring and research activities facilitates equitable allocation of finite conservation resources. We present a framework that identifies broad monitoring and research priorities for conservation areas, such as marine parks, and threatened species. Criteria within the framework are used to assess: the value (V) of assets; anthropogenic pressures (P) that affect assets; and the current state of asset knowledge (K). A panel of experts score criteria and the relative importance of each asset is calculated for monitoring (V * P), fundamental research (V * K) and applied research (V * P * K). The framework allows prioritisation of assets in an initial evaluation that agrees with institutional mandates, and facilitates future assessment of the feasibility and cost of monitoring or research in the implementation phase. The utility of the framework is that it can be easily applied by conservation practitioners and can concurrently prioritise monitoring and research of species, habitats and communities in marine and terrestrial environments.

AB - © The Government of Western Australia, 2015. Prioritisation of natural assets for monitoring and research activities facilitates equitable allocation of finite conservation resources. We present a framework that identifies broad monitoring and research priorities for conservation areas, such as marine parks, and threatened species. Criteria within the framework are used to assess: the value (V) of assets; anthropogenic pressures (P) that affect assets; and the current state of asset knowledge (K). A panel of experts score criteria and the relative importance of each asset is calculated for monitoring (V * P), fundamental research (V * K) and applied research (V * P * K). The framework allows prioritisation of assets in an initial evaluation that agrees with institutional mandates, and facilitates future assessment of the feasibility and cost of monitoring or research in the implementation phase. The utility of the framework is that it can be easily applied by conservation practitioners and can concurrently prioritise monitoring and research of species, habitats and communities in marine and terrestrial environments.

M3 - Article

VL - 9

SP - 227

EP - 237

JO - CALMScience

JF - CALMScience

SN - 1320-145X

IS - 3

ER -