Prevention of Eating Disorders: A Systematic Review of Randomized, Controlled Trials

Hunna Watson, T. Joyce, E. French, V. Willan, R.T. T. Kane, E.E. E. Tanner-Smith, J. McCormack, H. Dawkins, K.J. J. Hoiles, S.J. J. Egan

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

59 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: This systematic review evaluated the efficacy of universal, selective, and indicated eating disorder prevention. Method: A systematic literature search was conducted in Medline, PsycINFO, Embase, Scopus, and the Cochrane Collaboration Library databases to January 2016. Studies were included if they were randomized, controlled trials (RCT) and tested an eating disorder prevention program. We retrieved 13 RCTs of universal prevention (N = 3,989 participants, 55% female, M age = 13.0 years), 85 RCTs of selective prevention (N = 11,949 participants, 99% female, M age = 17.6 years), and 8 RCTs of indicated prevention (N = 510 participants, 100% female, M age = 20.1 years). Meta-analysis was performed with selective prevention trials. As there were a limited number of universal and indicated trials, narrative synthesis was conducted. Results: Media literacy had the most support for universal prevention. Most universal approaches showed significant modest effects on risk factors. Dissonance-based was the best supported approach for selective prevention. Cognitive-behavior therapy (CBT), a healthy weight program, media literacy, and psychoeducation, were also effective for selective prevention and effects were maintained at follow-up. CBT was supported for indicated prevention and effects were maintained at follow-up. Discussion: The modest effects for universal prevention were likely due to floor effects. The evidence for selective prevention suggests that empirically supported approaches should be disseminated on a wider basis. Our findings suggest CBT should be offered for indicated populations. Overall, results suggest efficacy of several prevention programs for reducing risk for eating disorders, and that wider dissemination is required. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, In
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)833-862
Number of pages30
JournalInternational Journal of Eating Disorders
Volume49
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Fingerprint

Cognitive Therapy
Randomized Controlled Trials
Libraries
Meta-Analysis
Databases
Education
Weights and Measures
Population
Feeding and Eating Disorders

Cite this

Watson, H., Joyce, T., French, E., Willan, V., Kane, R. T. T., Tanner-Smith, E. E. E., ... Egan, S. J. J. (2016). Prevention of Eating Disorders: A Systematic Review of Randomized, Controlled Trials. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 49(9), 833-862. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.22577
Watson, Hunna ; Joyce, T. ; French, E. ; Willan, V. ; Kane, R.T. T. ; Tanner-Smith, E.E. E. ; McCormack, J. ; Dawkins, H. ; Hoiles, K.J. J. ; Egan, S.J. J. / Prevention of Eating Disorders: A Systematic Review of Randomized, Controlled Trials. In: International Journal of Eating Disorders. 2016 ; Vol. 49, No. 9. pp. 833-862.
@article{37eb405695934eb9a641256fe306de53,
title = "Prevention of Eating Disorders: A Systematic Review of Randomized, Controlled Trials",
abstract = "Objective: This systematic review evaluated the efficacy of universal, selective, and indicated eating disorder prevention. Method: A systematic literature search was conducted in Medline, PsycINFO, Embase, Scopus, and the Cochrane Collaboration Library databases to January 2016. Studies were included if they were randomized, controlled trials (RCT) and tested an eating disorder prevention program. We retrieved 13 RCTs of universal prevention (N = 3,989 participants, 55{\%} female, M age = 13.0 years), 85 RCTs of selective prevention (N = 11,949 participants, 99{\%} female, M age = 17.6 years), and 8 RCTs of indicated prevention (N = 510 participants, 100{\%} female, M age = 20.1 years). Meta-analysis was performed with selective prevention trials. As there were a limited number of universal and indicated trials, narrative synthesis was conducted. Results: Media literacy had the most support for universal prevention. Most universal approaches showed significant modest effects on risk factors. Dissonance-based was the best supported approach for selective prevention. Cognitive-behavior therapy (CBT), a healthy weight program, media literacy, and psychoeducation, were also effective for selective prevention and effects were maintained at follow-up. CBT was supported for indicated prevention and effects were maintained at follow-up. Discussion: The modest effects for universal prevention were likely due to floor effects. The evidence for selective prevention suggests that empirically supported approaches should be disseminated on a wider basis. Our findings suggest CBT should be offered for indicated populations. Overall, results suggest efficacy of several prevention programs for reducing risk for eating disorders, and that wider dissemination is required. {\circledC} 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. {\circledC} 2016 Wiley Periodicals, In",
author = "Hunna Watson and T. Joyce and E. French and V. Willan and Kane, {R.T. T.} and Tanner-Smith, {E.E. E.} and J. McCormack and H. Dawkins and Hoiles, {K.J. J.} and Egan, {S.J. J.}",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1002/eat.22577",
language = "English",
volume = "49",
pages = "833--862",
journal = "International Journal of Eating Disorders",
issn = "0276-3478",
publisher = "John Wiley & Sons",
number = "9",

}

Watson, H, Joyce, T, French, E, Willan, V, Kane, RTT, Tanner-Smith, EEE, McCormack, J, Dawkins, H, Hoiles, KJJ & Egan, SJJ 2016, 'Prevention of Eating Disorders: A Systematic Review of Randomized, Controlled Trials' International Journal of Eating Disorders, vol. 49, no. 9, pp. 833-862. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.22577

Prevention of Eating Disorders: A Systematic Review of Randomized, Controlled Trials. / Watson, Hunna; Joyce, T.; French, E.; Willan, V.; Kane, R.T. T.; Tanner-Smith, E.E. E.; McCormack, J.; Dawkins, H.; Hoiles, K.J. J.; Egan, S.J. J.

In: International Journal of Eating Disorders, Vol. 49, No. 9, 2016, p. 833-862.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Prevention of Eating Disorders: A Systematic Review of Randomized, Controlled Trials

AU - Watson, Hunna

AU - Joyce, T.

AU - French, E.

AU - Willan, V.

AU - Kane, R.T. T.

AU - Tanner-Smith, E.E. E.

AU - McCormack, J.

AU - Dawkins, H.

AU - Hoiles, K.J. J.

AU - Egan, S.J. J.

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Objective: This systematic review evaluated the efficacy of universal, selective, and indicated eating disorder prevention. Method: A systematic literature search was conducted in Medline, PsycINFO, Embase, Scopus, and the Cochrane Collaboration Library databases to January 2016. Studies were included if they were randomized, controlled trials (RCT) and tested an eating disorder prevention program. We retrieved 13 RCTs of universal prevention (N = 3,989 participants, 55% female, M age = 13.0 years), 85 RCTs of selective prevention (N = 11,949 participants, 99% female, M age = 17.6 years), and 8 RCTs of indicated prevention (N = 510 participants, 100% female, M age = 20.1 years). Meta-analysis was performed with selective prevention trials. As there were a limited number of universal and indicated trials, narrative synthesis was conducted. Results: Media literacy had the most support for universal prevention. Most universal approaches showed significant modest effects on risk factors. Dissonance-based was the best supported approach for selective prevention. Cognitive-behavior therapy (CBT), a healthy weight program, media literacy, and psychoeducation, were also effective for selective prevention and effects were maintained at follow-up. CBT was supported for indicated prevention and effects were maintained at follow-up. Discussion: The modest effects for universal prevention were likely due to floor effects. The evidence for selective prevention suggests that empirically supported approaches should be disseminated on a wider basis. Our findings suggest CBT should be offered for indicated populations. Overall, results suggest efficacy of several prevention programs for reducing risk for eating disorders, and that wider dissemination is required. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, In

AB - Objective: This systematic review evaluated the efficacy of universal, selective, and indicated eating disorder prevention. Method: A systematic literature search was conducted in Medline, PsycINFO, Embase, Scopus, and the Cochrane Collaboration Library databases to January 2016. Studies were included if they were randomized, controlled trials (RCT) and tested an eating disorder prevention program. We retrieved 13 RCTs of universal prevention (N = 3,989 participants, 55% female, M age = 13.0 years), 85 RCTs of selective prevention (N = 11,949 participants, 99% female, M age = 17.6 years), and 8 RCTs of indicated prevention (N = 510 participants, 100% female, M age = 20.1 years). Meta-analysis was performed with selective prevention trials. As there were a limited number of universal and indicated trials, narrative synthesis was conducted. Results: Media literacy had the most support for universal prevention. Most universal approaches showed significant modest effects on risk factors. Dissonance-based was the best supported approach for selective prevention. Cognitive-behavior therapy (CBT), a healthy weight program, media literacy, and psychoeducation, were also effective for selective prevention and effects were maintained at follow-up. CBT was supported for indicated prevention and effects were maintained at follow-up. Discussion: The modest effects for universal prevention were likely due to floor effects. The evidence for selective prevention suggests that empirically supported approaches should be disseminated on a wider basis. Our findings suggest CBT should be offered for indicated populations. Overall, results suggest efficacy of several prevention programs for reducing risk for eating disorders, and that wider dissemination is required. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, In

U2 - 10.1002/eat.22577

DO - 10.1002/eat.22577

M3 - Review article

VL - 49

SP - 833

EP - 862

JO - International Journal of Eating Disorders

JF - International Journal of Eating Disorders

SN - 0276-3478

IS - 9

ER -