Prevalence of Helicobacter pylori in Indigenous West Australians: comparison between urban and remote rural populations

Helen Windsor, E.A. Abioye-Kuteyi, J.M. Leber, S.D. Morrow, Mahesh Bulsara, Barry Marshall

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

54 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: To determine and compare the prevalence of Helicobacter pylori in an urban and a remote rural Western Australian Indigenous community.Design: Cross-sectional study of Helicobacter pylon status determined by urea breath tests between mid-January 2003 and the end of June 2004.Participants: 520 self-selected fasting participants, comprising 270 members of the Martu community at Jigalong, Punmu and Parnngurr in the East Pilbara region (129 men, 141 women; age range, 2-90 years) and 250 people from the Perth Indigenous community (96 men, 154 women; age range, 3-75 years.Results: The overall prevalence of H. pylori was 76%, but the prevalence in the remote rural community was 91%, compared with 60% in the urban community. The odds of having H. pylon were six times greater for rural than for urban participants (odds ratio [OR], 6.34; 95% CI, 3.89-10.33). Further, the overall odds of H. pylori infection in males (rural and urban combined) were greater than for females (OR, 1.61; 95% CI, 1.02-2.54). In both communities, the prevalence of infection remained relatively constant after the age of 10.Conclusions: The prevalence of H. pylori in the two Indigenous communities was two to three times higher than that in the non-Indigenous Australian population and higher than that shown in previous studies in Indigenous Australians.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)210-213
JournalMedical Journal of Australia
Volume182
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 7 Mar 2005

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Prevalence of Helicobacter pylori in Indigenous West Australians: comparison between urban and remote rural populations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this