Predictors of effective formal mentoring: Is the mentor’s commitment all that matters?

A. Rogers, Alex Luksyte, C. Spitzmueller

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

© 2016 Taylor & Francis.The present research explores how the intersection of motivation and ability contributes to mentoring success. Extending the motivation-aptitude model of performance to mentoring effectiveness and building on socioanalytic theory, we examined whether mentor commitment and other mentor attributes impacted supervisors’ evaluation of mentors’ effectiveness. Using self-report and third-party rating data from a sample of 102 mentors and 14 supervisors from a multinational organization, support was found for our hypotheses. Consistent with our theorizing about the importance of supplementing mentor commitment with important aptitudes, the results of the multilevel analyses showed that mentor commitment did not translate to mentoring effectiveness as rated by one’s supervisor when mentors lacked getting along (i.e., self-monitoring and political skill) or getting ahead (learning goal orientation and strategic outlook) attributes.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)209-225
JournalHuman Performance
Volume29
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Fingerprint

Mentors
Aptitude
Motivation
Multilevel Analysis
Mentoring
Formal mentoring
Mentor
Predictors
Self Report
Learning
Research
Supervisors

Cite this

@article{72c6944d3c9c455a89a16ec4f3f82e4c,
title = "Predictors of effective formal mentoring: Is the mentor’s commitment all that matters?",
abstract = "{\circledC} 2016 Taylor & Francis.The present research explores how the intersection of motivation and ability contributes to mentoring success. Extending the motivation-aptitude model of performance to mentoring effectiveness and building on socioanalytic theory, we examined whether mentor commitment and other mentor attributes impacted supervisors’ evaluation of mentors’ effectiveness. Using self-report and third-party rating data from a sample of 102 mentors and 14 supervisors from a multinational organization, support was found for our hypotheses. Consistent with our theorizing about the importance of supplementing mentor commitment with important aptitudes, the results of the multilevel analyses showed that mentor commitment did not translate to mentoring effectiveness as rated by one’s supervisor when mentors lacked getting along (i.e., self-monitoring and political skill) or getting ahead (learning goal orientation and strategic outlook) attributes.",
author = "A. Rogers and Alex Luksyte and C. Spitzmueller",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1080/08959285.2016.1148035",
language = "English",
volume = "29",
pages = "209--225",
journal = "Human Performance",
issn = "0895-9285",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "3",

}

Predictors of effective formal mentoring: Is the mentor’s commitment all that matters? / Rogers, A.; Luksyte, Alex; Spitzmueller, C.

In: Human Performance, Vol. 29, No. 3, 2016, p. 209-225.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Predictors of effective formal mentoring: Is the mentor’s commitment all that matters?

AU - Rogers, A.

AU - Luksyte, Alex

AU - Spitzmueller, C.

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - © 2016 Taylor & Francis.The present research explores how the intersection of motivation and ability contributes to mentoring success. Extending the motivation-aptitude model of performance to mentoring effectiveness and building on socioanalytic theory, we examined whether mentor commitment and other mentor attributes impacted supervisors’ evaluation of mentors’ effectiveness. Using self-report and third-party rating data from a sample of 102 mentors and 14 supervisors from a multinational organization, support was found for our hypotheses. Consistent with our theorizing about the importance of supplementing mentor commitment with important aptitudes, the results of the multilevel analyses showed that mentor commitment did not translate to mentoring effectiveness as rated by one’s supervisor when mentors lacked getting along (i.e., self-monitoring and political skill) or getting ahead (learning goal orientation and strategic outlook) attributes.

AB - © 2016 Taylor & Francis.The present research explores how the intersection of motivation and ability contributes to mentoring success. Extending the motivation-aptitude model of performance to mentoring effectiveness and building on socioanalytic theory, we examined whether mentor commitment and other mentor attributes impacted supervisors’ evaluation of mentors’ effectiveness. Using self-report and third-party rating data from a sample of 102 mentors and 14 supervisors from a multinational organization, support was found for our hypotheses. Consistent with our theorizing about the importance of supplementing mentor commitment with important aptitudes, the results of the multilevel analyses showed that mentor commitment did not translate to mentoring effectiveness as rated by one’s supervisor when mentors lacked getting along (i.e., self-monitoring and political skill) or getting ahead (learning goal orientation and strategic outlook) attributes.

U2 - 10.1080/08959285.2016.1148035

DO - 10.1080/08959285.2016.1148035

M3 - Article

VL - 29

SP - 209

EP - 225

JO - Human Performance

JF - Human Performance

SN - 0895-9285

IS - 3

ER -