Prediction of outcomes of extremely low gestational age newborns in Australia and New Zealand

Kee Thai Yeo, Nadom Safi, Yueping Alex Wang, Renate Le Marsney, Timothy Schindler, Srinivas Bolisetty, Ross Haslam, Kei Lui, Peter Marshall, Peter Schmidt, Paul Craven, Koert De Waal, Karen Simmer, Andy Gill, Jane Pillow, Jacqueline Stack, Lucy Cooke, Dan Casalaz, Jim Holberton, Charles BarfieldLyn Downe, Vjay Singde, Michael Stewart, Andrew Berry, Kathryn Browning Carmo, Rod Hunt, Charles Kilburn, Tony De Paoli, Mary Paradisis, Ingrid Rieger, Tracey Lutz, Shelley Reid, David Cartwright, Pieter Koorts, Carl Kuschel, Lex Doyle, Andrew Numa, Hazel Carlisle, Nadia Badawi, Guan Koh, Steven Resnick, Melissa Luig, Chad Andersen, Adrienne Lyn, Brian Darlow, Roland Broadbent, Lindsay Mildenhall, Mariam Buksh, David Bourchier, Lee Carpenter, Vaughan Richardson, Georgina Chambers, Adam Buckmaster, Victor Samuel Rajadurai, Barbara Bajuk

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective To determine the accuracy of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) calculator in predicting death and neurodevelopmental impairment in Australian and New Zealand infants. Design Population-based cohort study. setting Australia and New Zealand. Patients Preterm infants 22–25 completed weeks gestation. Interventions Comparison of NICHD calculator predicted rates of death and death or neurodevelopmental impairment, with actual rates recorded in the Australian and New Zealand Neonatal Network cohort. Main outcome measures Infant death and death or neurodevelopmental impairment rates. results A total of 714 infants were included in the study. Of these infants, 100 (14.0%) were <24 weeks, 389 (54.5%) male, 529 (74.1%) were singletons, 42 (5.9%) had intrauterine growth restriction, 563 (78.9%) received antenatal steroids and 625 (87.5 %) were born in a tertiary hospital. There were 288 deaths (40.3%), 75 infants (10.5%) with neurodevelopment impairment and 363 (50.8%) with death or neurodevelopmental impairment. The area under the curve (AUC) for prediction of death and the composite death or neurodevelopmental impairment by the NICHD calculator in our population was 0.65(95% CI 0.61 to 0.69) and 0.65 (95% CI 0.61 to 0.69), respectively. When stratified and compared with gestational age outcomes, the AUC did not change substantially for the outcomes investigated. The calculator was less accurate with outcome predictions at the extreme categories of predicted outcomes—underestimation of outcomes for those predicted to have the lowest risk (<20%) and overestimation for those in the highest risk category (≫80%). conclusion In our recent cohort of extremely preterm infants, the NICHD model does not accurately predict outcomes and is marginally better than gestational age based outcomes.

Original languageEnglish
Article numberY
JournalBMJ Paediatrics Open
Volume1
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2017

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Prediction of outcomes of extremely low gestational age newborns in Australia and New Zealand'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this