TY - CHAP
T1 - Possession
AU - Ponsonnet, Maïa
PY - 2023/7/20
Y1 - 2023/7/20
N2 - This chapter presents the results of a survey of the grammatical expression of possession in a balanced sample of thirty Australian languages. Pama-Nyungan languages exhibit a relatively unified pattern, typically featuring an adnominal construction where the dependent is marked; as well as another adnominal construction where neither the possessor nor the possessum are marked, but they share case marking. The latter construction normally specializes for inalienable possessions. Non-Pama-Nyungan languages present more diversity. Their adnominal possessive constructions, are more often head-marking but vary in their marking strategies. Few non-Pama-Nyungan languages have a second adnominal construction for inalienable possessions, however some have traces of it, and others have clausal inalienable constructions. Possessive constructions can delineate more than one class, and some Australian languages exhibit relatively complex yet understudied systems. Interestingly, the semantics of inalienable classes of nouns is remarkably coherent, across the Pama-Nyungan/non-Pama-Nyungan divide, and independently of the type of construction involved.
AB - This chapter presents the results of a survey of the grammatical expression of possession in a balanced sample of thirty Australian languages. Pama-Nyungan languages exhibit a relatively unified pattern, typically featuring an adnominal construction where the dependent is marked; as well as another adnominal construction where neither the possessor nor the possessum are marked, but they share case marking. The latter construction normally specializes for inalienable possessions. Non-Pama-Nyungan languages present more diversity. Their adnominal possessive constructions, are more often head-marking but vary in their marking strategies. Few non-Pama-Nyungan languages have a second adnominal construction for inalienable possessions, however some have traces of it, and others have clausal inalienable constructions. Possessive constructions can delineate more than one class, and some Australian languages exhibit relatively complex yet understudied systems. Interestingly, the semantics of inalienable classes of nouns is remarkably coherent, across the Pama-Nyungan/non-Pama-Nyungan divide, and independently of the type of construction involved.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85172369349&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://onesearch.library.uwa.edu.au/permalink/61UWA_INST/1vk1d8f/alma991458542002101
UR - https://global.oup.com/academic/product/the-oxford-guide-to-australian-languages-9780198824978?cc=au&lang=en&
U2 - 10.1093/oso/9780198824978.003.0022
DO - 10.1093/oso/9780198824978.003.0022
M3 - Chapter
AN - SCOPUS:85172369349
SN - 9780198824978
T3 - Oxford Guides to the World's Languages Series
SP - 243
EP - 252
BT - The Oxford Guide to Australian Languages
A2 - Bowern, Claire
PB - Oxford University Press, USA
ER -