TY - JOUR
T1 - Positive end-expiratory pressure adjusted for intra-abdominal pressure – A pilot study
AU - Regli, Adrian
AU - De Keulenaer, Bart Leon
AU - Palermo, Annamaria
AU - van Heerden, Peter Vernon
PY - 2018/2/1
Y1 - 2018/2/1
N2 - Purpose Intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) is associated with impaired respiratory function. Animal data suggest that positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) levels adjusted to intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) levels may counteract IAH-induced respiratory dysfunction. In this pilot study, our aim was to assess whether PEEP adjusted for IAP can be applied safely in patients with IAH. Materials and methods We included patients on mechanical ventilation and with IAH. Patients were excluded with severe cardiovascular dysfunction or severe hypoxemia or if the patient was in imminent danger of dying. Following a recruitment manoeuvre, the following PEEP levels were randomly applied: PEEP of 5 cmH2O (baseline), PEEP = 50% of IAP, and PEEP = 100% of IAP. After a 30 min equilibration period we measured arterial blood gases and cardio-respiratory parameters. Results Fifteen patients were enrolled. Six (41%) patients did not tolerate PEEP = 100% IAP due to hypoxemia, hypotension or endotracheal cuff leak. PaO2/FiO2 ratios were 234 (68), 271 (99), and 329 (107) respectively. The differences were significant (p = 0.009) only between baseline and PEEP = 100% IAP. Conclusions PEEP = 100% of IAP was not well-tolerated and only marginally improved oxygenation in ventilated patients with IAH.
AB - Purpose Intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) is associated with impaired respiratory function. Animal data suggest that positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) levels adjusted to intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) levels may counteract IAH-induced respiratory dysfunction. In this pilot study, our aim was to assess whether PEEP adjusted for IAP can be applied safely in patients with IAH. Materials and methods We included patients on mechanical ventilation and with IAH. Patients were excluded with severe cardiovascular dysfunction or severe hypoxemia or if the patient was in imminent danger of dying. Following a recruitment manoeuvre, the following PEEP levels were randomly applied: PEEP of 5 cmH2O (baseline), PEEP = 50% of IAP, and PEEP = 100% of IAP. After a 30 min equilibration period we measured arterial blood gases and cardio-respiratory parameters. Results Fifteen patients were enrolled. Six (41%) patients did not tolerate PEEP = 100% IAP due to hypoxemia, hypotension or endotracheal cuff leak. PaO2/FiO2 ratios were 234 (68), 271 (99), and 329 (107) respectively. The differences were significant (p = 0.009) only between baseline and PEEP = 100% IAP. Conclusions PEEP = 100% of IAP was not well-tolerated and only marginally improved oxygenation in ventilated patients with IAH.
KW - Abdominal compartment syndrome
KW - Airway pressures
KW - Cuff leak
KW - Intra-abdominal hypertension
KW - Intra-abdominal pressure
KW - Positive end-expiratory pressure
KW - Respiratory compliance
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85031663054&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jcrc.2017.10.012
DO - 10.1016/j.jcrc.2017.10.012
M3 - Article
C2 - 29054769
AN - SCOPUS:85031663054
SN - 0883-9441
VL - 43
SP - 390
EP - 394
JO - Journal of Critical Care
JF - Journal of Critical Care
ER -