Pose estimation or manual digitising: Can automating technologies change the current in-field assessment of high jump?

Molly Goldacre, Zac Born, Marion Mundt, Emma Millett, Elissa Philips, Jacqueline Alderson

Research output: Chapter in Book/Conference paperConference paperpeer-review

40 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Biomechanists spend significant time completing the time-consuming task of manually digitising 2D videos to derive kinematic spatiotemporal parameters. Recent advances in 2D pose estimation models (PEMs) hold promise for automating the determination of parameters in sport. This study developed an automated PEM digitising and analysis pipeline (AAP) for high jump. We investigated differences in four spatiotemporal and joint angle outputs from traditional manual processing pipelines (MAP) and the AAP using paired t-tests, intra-class correlations and effect size analysis. Statistical analysis revealed that knee angles derived from the MAP and AAP were not different, whereas penultimate foot contact time and both body angle “lean” measures were different. The custom AAP considerably reduced processing time for the selected high jump execution parameters.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationISBS Proceedings Archive
Number of pages4
Volume41
Publication statusPublished - 12 Jul 2023
Event41st Conference of the International Society of Biomechanics in Sports - Milwaukee, United States
Duration: 12 Jul 202316 Jul 2023
Conference number: 41

Conference

Conference41st Conference of the International Society of Biomechanics in Sports
Abbreviated titleISBS 2023
Country/TerritoryUnited States
CityMilwaukee
Period12/07/2316/07/23

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Pose estimation or manual digitising: Can automating technologies change the current in-field assessment of high jump?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this