TY - JOUR
T1 - Poor executive functioning in children born very preterm: Using dual-task methodology to untangle alternative theoretical interpretations
AU - Delane, Louise
AU - Bayliss, Donna
AU - Campbell, Catherine
AU - Reid, C.
AU - French, Noel
AU - Anderson, M.
PY - 2016/12/1
Y1 - 2016/12/1
N2 - © 2016 Elsevier Inc.Two alternative theoretical explanations have been proposed for the difficulties with executive functioning observed in children born very preterm (VP; ?32 weeks): a general vulnerability (i.e., in attentional and processing capacities), which has a cascading impact on increasingly complex cognitive functions, and a selective vulnerability in executive-level cognitive processes. It is difficult to tease apart this important theoretical distinction because executive functioning tasks are, by default, complex tasks. In the current study, an experimental dual-task design was employed to control for differences in task difficulty in order to isolate executive control. Participants included 50 VP children (mean age = 7.29 years) and 39 term peer controls (mean age = 7.28 years). The VP group exhibited a greater dual-task cost relative to controls despite experimental control for individual differences in baseline ability on the component single tasks. This group difference also remained under a condition of reduced task difficulty. These results suggest a selective vulnerability in executive-level processes that can be separated from any general vulnerability.
AB - © 2016 Elsevier Inc.Two alternative theoretical explanations have been proposed for the difficulties with executive functioning observed in children born very preterm (VP; ?32 weeks): a general vulnerability (i.e., in attentional and processing capacities), which has a cascading impact on increasingly complex cognitive functions, and a selective vulnerability in executive-level cognitive processes. It is difficult to tease apart this important theoretical distinction because executive functioning tasks are, by default, complex tasks. In the current study, an experimental dual-task design was employed to control for differences in task difficulty in order to isolate executive control. Participants included 50 VP children (mean age = 7.29 years) and 39 term peer controls (mean age = 7.28 years). The VP group exhibited a greater dual-task cost relative to controls despite experimental control for individual differences in baseline ability on the component single tasks. This group difference also remained under a condition of reduced task difficulty. These results suggest a selective vulnerability in executive-level processes that can be separated from any general vulnerability.
U2 - 10.1016/j.jecp.2016.08.002
DO - 10.1016/j.jecp.2016.08.002
M3 - Article
C2 - 27580448
SN - 0022-0965
VL - 152
SP - 264
EP - 277
JO - Journal of Experimental Child Psychology
JF - Journal of Experimental Child Psychology
ER -