Political Attitudes and the Processing of Misinformation Corrections

Ullrich K.H. Ecker, Li Chang Ang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Misinformation often continues to influence people’s memory and inferential reasoning after it has been retracted; this is known as the continued influence effect (CIE). Previous research investigating the role of attitude-based motivated reasoning in this context has found conflicting results: Some studies have found that worldview can have a strong impact on the magnitude of the CIE, such that retractions are less effective if the misinformation is congruent with a person’s relevant attitudes, in which case the retractions can even backfire. Other studies have failed to find evidence for an effect of attitudes on the processing of misinformation corrections. The present study used political misinformation—specifically fictional scenarios involving misconduct by politicians from left-wing and right-wing parties—and tested participants identifying with those political parties. Results showed that in this type of scenario, partisan attitudes have an impact on the processing of retractions, in particular (1) if the misinformation relates to a general assertion rather than just a specific singular event and (2) if the misinformation is congruent with a conservative partisanship.

Original languageEnglish
JournalPolitical Psychology
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 1 Oct 2018

Fingerprint

political attitude
Communication
scenario
worldview
politician
human being
event
evidence
Research
Scenarios

Cite this

@article{b7ac81f92147499b89b07e5122a8d6ea,
title = "Political Attitudes and the Processing of Misinformation Corrections",
abstract = "Misinformation often continues to influence people’s memory and inferential reasoning after it has been retracted; this is known as the continued influence effect (CIE). Previous research investigating the role of attitude-based motivated reasoning in this context has found conflicting results: Some studies have found that worldview can have a strong impact on the magnitude of the CIE, such that retractions are less effective if the misinformation is congruent with a person’s relevant attitudes, in which case the retractions can even backfire. Other studies have failed to find evidence for an effect of attitudes on the processing of misinformation corrections. The present study used political misinformation—specifically fictional scenarios involving misconduct by politicians from left-wing and right-wing parties—and tested participants identifying with those political parties. Results showed that in this type of scenario, partisan attitudes have an impact on the processing of retractions, in particular (1) if the misinformation relates to a general assertion rather than just a specific singular event and (2) if the misinformation is congruent with a conservative partisanship.",
keywords = "continued influence effect, misinformation, motivated reasoning, political attitudes, worldview-backfire effect",
author = "Ecker, {Ullrich K.H.} and Ang, {Li Chang}",
year = "2018",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/pops.12494",
language = "English",
journal = "Political Psychology",
issn = "0162-895X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

}

Political Attitudes and the Processing of Misinformation Corrections. / Ecker, Ullrich K.H.; Ang, Li Chang.

In: Political Psychology, 01.10.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Political Attitudes and the Processing of Misinformation Corrections

AU - Ecker, Ullrich K.H.

AU - Ang, Li Chang

PY - 2018/10/1

Y1 - 2018/10/1

N2 - Misinformation often continues to influence people’s memory and inferential reasoning after it has been retracted; this is known as the continued influence effect (CIE). Previous research investigating the role of attitude-based motivated reasoning in this context has found conflicting results: Some studies have found that worldview can have a strong impact on the magnitude of the CIE, such that retractions are less effective if the misinformation is congruent with a person’s relevant attitudes, in which case the retractions can even backfire. Other studies have failed to find evidence for an effect of attitudes on the processing of misinformation corrections. The present study used political misinformation—specifically fictional scenarios involving misconduct by politicians from left-wing and right-wing parties—and tested participants identifying with those political parties. Results showed that in this type of scenario, partisan attitudes have an impact on the processing of retractions, in particular (1) if the misinformation relates to a general assertion rather than just a specific singular event and (2) if the misinformation is congruent with a conservative partisanship.

AB - Misinformation often continues to influence people’s memory and inferential reasoning after it has been retracted; this is known as the continued influence effect (CIE). Previous research investigating the role of attitude-based motivated reasoning in this context has found conflicting results: Some studies have found that worldview can have a strong impact on the magnitude of the CIE, such that retractions are less effective if the misinformation is congruent with a person’s relevant attitudes, in which case the retractions can even backfire. Other studies have failed to find evidence for an effect of attitudes on the processing of misinformation corrections. The present study used political misinformation—specifically fictional scenarios involving misconduct by politicians from left-wing and right-wing parties—and tested participants identifying with those political parties. Results showed that in this type of scenario, partisan attitudes have an impact on the processing of retractions, in particular (1) if the misinformation relates to a general assertion rather than just a specific singular event and (2) if the misinformation is congruent with a conservative partisanship.

KW - continued influence effect

KW - misinformation

KW - motivated reasoning

KW - political attitudes

KW - worldview-backfire effect

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85053123912&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/pops.12494

DO - 10.1111/pops.12494

M3 - Article

JO - Political Psychology

JF - Political Psychology

SN - 0162-895X

ER -