Policy-oriented environmental research: What is it worth?

David J. Pannell, Julian M. Alston, Scott Jeffrey, Yvonne M. Buckley, Peter Vesk, Jonathan R. Rhodes, Eve McDonald-Madden, Simon Nally, Garry Goucher, Tas Thamo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Environmental and conservation scientists are increasingly being asked to justify their work in terms of benefits to society. This article describes economic theory for conceptualizing the benefits from environmental research, and provides a framework for estimating those benefits. In particular we discuss the evaluation of environmental science that is intended to benefit society through informing policy decisions. The chain between environmental research and its benefits through policy change includes at least four links: the research itself, policy change, behavior change and environmental change. Each of these four stages presents challenges and entails time lags. If any link fails, the chain breaks. The standard economic model of supply and demand, which is used to quantify benefits from research into market goods, can be adapted for application to environmental goods. Improved conceptualization and measurement of benefits from environmental research would assist environmental scientists to: (1) select research topics that are likely to deliver large environmental benefits; (2) design their research in a way that will increase its relevance, usefulness and potential impact on policy and, ultimately, the environment; and (3) make the case for funding particular research proposals. It could assist research agencies or research funders to: prioritize proposed research; make a case for increased funding for environmental research; and identify obstacles to the translation of research into environmental impacts, allowing attention to be focused on addressing these bottlenecks.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)64-71
Number of pages8
JournalEnvironmental Science and Policy
Volume86
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Aug 2018

Fingerprint

environmental research
funding
research policy
economic model
economic theory
research planning
policy
environmental impact
conservation
supply
environmental change
demand
market
science
evaluation

Cite this

Pannell, D. J., Alston, J. M., Jeffrey, S., Buckley, Y. M., Vesk, P., Rhodes, J. R., ... Thamo, T. (2018). Policy-oriented environmental research: What is it worth? Environmental Science and Policy, 86, 64-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2018.05.005
Pannell, David J. ; Alston, Julian M. ; Jeffrey, Scott ; Buckley, Yvonne M. ; Vesk, Peter ; Rhodes, Jonathan R. ; McDonald-Madden, Eve ; Nally, Simon ; Goucher, Garry ; Thamo, Tas. / Policy-oriented environmental research : What is it worth?. In: Environmental Science and Policy. 2018 ; Vol. 86. pp. 64-71.
@article{9896326ebbe945759ae3287d6994eb06,
title = "Policy-oriented environmental research: What is it worth?",
abstract = "Environmental and conservation scientists are increasingly being asked to justify their work in terms of benefits to society. This article describes economic theory for conceptualizing the benefits from environmental research, and provides a framework for estimating those benefits. In particular we discuss the evaluation of environmental science that is intended to benefit society through informing policy decisions. The chain between environmental research and its benefits through policy change includes at least four links: the research itself, policy change, behavior change and environmental change. Each of these four stages presents challenges and entails time lags. If any link fails, the chain breaks. The standard economic model of supply and demand, which is used to quantify benefits from research into market goods, can be adapted for application to environmental goods. Improved conceptualization and measurement of benefits from environmental research would assist environmental scientists to: (1) select research topics that are likely to deliver large environmental benefits; (2) design their research in a way that will increase its relevance, usefulness and potential impact on policy and, ultimately, the environment; and (3) make the case for funding particular research proposals. It could assist research agencies or research funders to: prioritize proposed research; make a case for increased funding for environmental research; and identify obstacles to the translation of research into environmental impacts, allowing attention to be focused on addressing these bottlenecks.",
keywords = "Applied research, Economics, Environment, Research evaluation, Research impact, Research prioritization",
author = "Pannell, {David J.} and Alston, {Julian M.} and Scott Jeffrey and Buckley, {Yvonne M.} and Peter Vesk and Rhodes, {Jonathan R.} and Eve McDonald-Madden and Simon Nally and Garry Goucher and Tas Thamo",
year = "2018",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.envsci.2018.05.005",
language = "English",
volume = "86",
pages = "64--71",
journal = "Environmental Science & Policy",
issn = "1462-9011",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Pannell, DJ, Alston, JM, Jeffrey, S, Buckley, YM, Vesk, P, Rhodes, JR, McDonald-Madden, E, Nally, S, Goucher, G & Thamo, T 2018, 'Policy-oriented environmental research: What is it worth?' Environmental Science and Policy, vol. 86, pp. 64-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2018.05.005

Policy-oriented environmental research : What is it worth? / Pannell, David J.; Alston, Julian M.; Jeffrey, Scott; Buckley, Yvonne M.; Vesk, Peter; Rhodes, Jonathan R.; McDonald-Madden, Eve; Nally, Simon; Goucher, Garry; Thamo, Tas.

In: Environmental Science and Policy, Vol. 86, 01.08.2018, p. 64-71.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Policy-oriented environmental research

T2 - What is it worth?

AU - Pannell, David J.

AU - Alston, Julian M.

AU - Jeffrey, Scott

AU - Buckley, Yvonne M.

AU - Vesk, Peter

AU - Rhodes, Jonathan R.

AU - McDonald-Madden, Eve

AU - Nally, Simon

AU - Goucher, Garry

AU - Thamo, Tas

PY - 2018/8/1

Y1 - 2018/8/1

N2 - Environmental and conservation scientists are increasingly being asked to justify their work in terms of benefits to society. This article describes economic theory for conceptualizing the benefits from environmental research, and provides a framework for estimating those benefits. In particular we discuss the evaluation of environmental science that is intended to benefit society through informing policy decisions. The chain between environmental research and its benefits through policy change includes at least four links: the research itself, policy change, behavior change and environmental change. Each of these four stages presents challenges and entails time lags. If any link fails, the chain breaks. The standard economic model of supply and demand, which is used to quantify benefits from research into market goods, can be adapted for application to environmental goods. Improved conceptualization and measurement of benefits from environmental research would assist environmental scientists to: (1) select research topics that are likely to deliver large environmental benefits; (2) design their research in a way that will increase its relevance, usefulness and potential impact on policy and, ultimately, the environment; and (3) make the case for funding particular research proposals. It could assist research agencies or research funders to: prioritize proposed research; make a case for increased funding for environmental research; and identify obstacles to the translation of research into environmental impacts, allowing attention to be focused on addressing these bottlenecks.

AB - Environmental and conservation scientists are increasingly being asked to justify their work in terms of benefits to society. This article describes economic theory for conceptualizing the benefits from environmental research, and provides a framework for estimating those benefits. In particular we discuss the evaluation of environmental science that is intended to benefit society through informing policy decisions. The chain between environmental research and its benefits through policy change includes at least four links: the research itself, policy change, behavior change and environmental change. Each of these four stages presents challenges and entails time lags. If any link fails, the chain breaks. The standard economic model of supply and demand, which is used to quantify benefits from research into market goods, can be adapted for application to environmental goods. Improved conceptualization and measurement of benefits from environmental research would assist environmental scientists to: (1) select research topics that are likely to deliver large environmental benefits; (2) design their research in a way that will increase its relevance, usefulness and potential impact on policy and, ultimately, the environment; and (3) make the case for funding particular research proposals. It could assist research agencies or research funders to: prioritize proposed research; make a case for increased funding for environmental research; and identify obstacles to the translation of research into environmental impacts, allowing attention to be focused on addressing these bottlenecks.

KW - Applied research

KW - Economics

KW - Environment

KW - Research evaluation

KW - Research impact

KW - Research prioritization

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85047084135&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.envsci.2018.05.005

DO - 10.1016/j.envsci.2018.05.005

M3 - Article

VL - 86

SP - 64

EP - 71

JO - Environmental Science & Policy

JF - Environmental Science & Policy

SN - 1462-9011

ER -