Police, public, and arrestee perceptions of body-worn video: a single jurisdictional multiple-perspective analysis

Joseph Clare, Darren Henstock, Christine McComb, Roy Newland, Geoffrey Barnes, Murray Lee, Emmeline Taylor

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article analyzes police, public, and arrestee survey responses from a single jurisdiction to give a multiple-perspective insight into the use of body-worn video (BWV) cameras by police. Police attitudinal data were collected from before (n = 190), during (n = 139), and at the conclusion (n = 221) of a BWV implementation trial. Public attitudes were collected at the conclusion of the
BWV implementation trial via online survey (n = 995 respondents) and intercept survey (n = 428 respondents). Arrestee attitudes (n = 302) were collected for detainees in police custody over a 6-month period immediately preceding the BWV trial. Results showed (a) all three perspectives were supportive of the use of BWV, (b) the extent to which police felt BWV influenced their behavior tempered during the trial, (c) the public who had encountered BWV-wearing officers and
the arrestee sample indicated limited belief that BWV would reduce bad behavior, and (d) there was clear contention about the policy and practice decisions around recording. These findings have significance for BWV trials, commenting on the importance of collecting police attitudes at multiple points, separating the attitudes of public who did encounter police-wearing BWV, and data collection/
policy for evaluation outcomes.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-18
Number of pages18
JournalCriminal Justice Review
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 2 May 2019

Fingerprint

police
video
child custody
online survey
recording
jurisdiction
evaluation

Cite this

Clare, Joseph ; Henstock, Darren ; McComb, Christine ; Newland, Roy ; Barnes, Geoffrey ; Lee, Murray ; Taylor, Emmeline. / Police, public, and arrestee perceptions of body-worn video : a single jurisdictional multiple-perspective analysis. In: Criminal Justice Review. 2019 ; pp. 1-18.
@article{547dfe457f1246f487abfb99b49f7c37,
title = "Police, public, and arrestee perceptions of body-worn video: a single jurisdictional multiple-perspective analysis",
abstract = "This article analyzes police, public, and arrestee survey responses from a single jurisdiction to give a multiple-perspective insight into the use of body-worn video (BWV) cameras by police. Police attitudinal data were collected from before (n = 190), during (n = 139), and at the conclusion (n = 221) of a BWV implementation trial. Public attitudes were collected at the conclusion of theBWV implementation trial via online survey (n = 995 respondents) and intercept survey (n = 428 respondents). Arrestee attitudes (n = 302) were collected for detainees in police custody over a 6-month period immediately preceding the BWV trial. Results showed (a) all three perspectives were supportive of the use of BWV, (b) the extent to which police felt BWV influenced their behavior tempered during the trial, (c) the public who had encountered BWV-wearing officers andthe arrestee sample indicated limited belief that BWV would reduce bad behavior, and (d) there was clear contention about the policy and practice decisions around recording. These findings have significance for BWV trials, commenting on the importance of collecting police attitudes at multiple points, separating the attitudes of public who did encounter police-wearing BWV, and data collection/policy for evaluation outcomes.",
keywords = "body-worn video cameras, police surveys, public surveys, arrestee surveys",
author = "Joseph Clare and Darren Henstock and Christine McComb and Roy Newland and Geoffrey Barnes and Murray Lee and Emmeline Taylor",
year = "2019",
month = "5",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1177/0734016819846236",
language = "English",
pages = "1--18",
journal = "Criminal Justice Review",
issn = "0734-0168",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",

}

Police, public, and arrestee perceptions of body-worn video : a single jurisdictional multiple-perspective analysis. / Clare, Joseph; Henstock, Darren; McComb, Christine; Newland, Roy; Barnes, Geoffrey; Lee, Murray; Taylor, Emmeline.

In: Criminal Justice Review, 02.05.2019, p. 1-18.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Police, public, and arrestee perceptions of body-worn video

T2 - a single jurisdictional multiple-perspective analysis

AU - Clare, Joseph

AU - Henstock, Darren

AU - McComb, Christine

AU - Newland, Roy

AU - Barnes, Geoffrey

AU - Lee, Murray

AU - Taylor, Emmeline

PY - 2019/5/2

Y1 - 2019/5/2

N2 - This article analyzes police, public, and arrestee survey responses from a single jurisdiction to give a multiple-perspective insight into the use of body-worn video (BWV) cameras by police. Police attitudinal data were collected from before (n = 190), during (n = 139), and at the conclusion (n = 221) of a BWV implementation trial. Public attitudes were collected at the conclusion of theBWV implementation trial via online survey (n = 995 respondents) and intercept survey (n = 428 respondents). Arrestee attitudes (n = 302) were collected for detainees in police custody over a 6-month period immediately preceding the BWV trial. Results showed (a) all three perspectives were supportive of the use of BWV, (b) the extent to which police felt BWV influenced their behavior tempered during the trial, (c) the public who had encountered BWV-wearing officers andthe arrestee sample indicated limited belief that BWV would reduce bad behavior, and (d) there was clear contention about the policy and practice decisions around recording. These findings have significance for BWV trials, commenting on the importance of collecting police attitudes at multiple points, separating the attitudes of public who did encounter police-wearing BWV, and data collection/policy for evaluation outcomes.

AB - This article analyzes police, public, and arrestee survey responses from a single jurisdiction to give a multiple-perspective insight into the use of body-worn video (BWV) cameras by police. Police attitudinal data were collected from before (n = 190), during (n = 139), and at the conclusion (n = 221) of a BWV implementation trial. Public attitudes were collected at the conclusion of theBWV implementation trial via online survey (n = 995 respondents) and intercept survey (n = 428 respondents). Arrestee attitudes (n = 302) were collected for detainees in police custody over a 6-month period immediately preceding the BWV trial. Results showed (a) all three perspectives were supportive of the use of BWV, (b) the extent to which police felt BWV influenced their behavior tempered during the trial, (c) the public who had encountered BWV-wearing officers andthe arrestee sample indicated limited belief that BWV would reduce bad behavior, and (d) there was clear contention about the policy and practice decisions around recording. These findings have significance for BWV trials, commenting on the importance of collecting police attitudes at multiple points, separating the attitudes of public who did encounter police-wearing BWV, and data collection/policy for evaluation outcomes.

KW - body-worn video cameras

KW - police surveys

KW - public surveys

KW - arrestee surveys

U2 - 10.1177/0734016819846236

DO - 10.1177/0734016819846236

M3 - Article

SP - 1

EP - 18

JO - Criminal Justice Review

JF - Criminal Justice Review

SN - 0734-0168

ER -