Pleural infection: Controversies on the therapeutic strategies

Ken K.P. Chan, Estee P.M. Lau, Y. C.Gary Lee

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

Purpose of review Management of pleural infection remains heterogeneous worldwide. This review highlights current controversies in therapeutic strategies for pleural infection, focusing particularly on recent studies and their implications. Recent findings The introduction of intrapleural therapy combining alteplase [a tissue plasminogen activator (tPA)] and deoxyribonuclease (DNase) has revolutionized treatment practices, though the optimal delivery and dosing regimen is an area of active investigation. Variations to simplify administration protocols and/or to lower the required drug doses have been published. Most were exploratory studies, but the variations showed maintained therapeutic efficacy. Whether intrapleural alteplase/DNase or video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) is superior is a topic of debate. Retrospective comparative analyses between the two revealed no clear benefits on all-cause mortality from either approach. Pilot randomized trials have been published and further full-scale, head-to-head trials are underway. Summary Effective management of pleural infection involves adequate pleural drainage and appropriate antibiotic use. This review outlines the current evidence (and its limitations) and highlights knowledge gaps in optimizing the therapeutic strategies.

Original languageEnglish
Number of pages5
JournalCurrent Opinion in Pulmonary Medicine
Volume31
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 18 Feb 2025

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Pleural infection: Controversies on the therapeutic strategies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this